These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23829006)

  • 1. Dental materials--what goes where? Class I and II cavities.
    Burke FJ; Mackenzie L; Sands P
    Dent Update; 2013 May; 40(4):260-2, 264-6, 269-70 passim. PubMed ID: 23829006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nanomicrohybrid composites make posterior placement easier.
    Vargas M
    Dent Today; 2012 May; 31(5):128, 130-1. PubMed ID: 22650094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technique tips--the modified super-closed sandwich technique.
    Smithson J
    Dent Update; 2013 Mar; 40(2):155-6. PubMed ID: 23600042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Worley DC; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 22342563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oral diagnosis and treatment planning: part 8. Reviews and maintenance of restorations.
    Smales R; Yip K
    Br Dent J; 2012 Oct; 213(8):387-94. PubMed ID: 23099691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct and indirect restorative materials.
    ADA Council on Scientific Affairs
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Apr; 134(4):463-72. PubMed ID: 12733780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
    Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.