These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23829027)

  • 1. I trust it, but I don't know why: effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system.
    Merritt SM; Heimbaugh H; LaChapell J; Lee D
    Hum Factors; 2013 Jun; 55(3):520-34. PubMed ID: 23829027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mood and trust in intuition interactively orchestrate correspondence between implicit and explicit attitudes.
    Huntsinger JR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1245-58. PubMed ID: 21610200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring Individual Differences in the Perfect Automation Schema.
    Merritt SM; Unnerstall JL; Lee D; Huber K
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):740-53. PubMed ID: 25882304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation.
    Pop VL; Shrewsbury A; Durso FT
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):545-56. PubMed ID: 25977317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relations between implicit and explicit measures of attitudes and measures of behavior: evidence of moderation by individual difference variables.
    Conner MT; Perugini M; O'Gorman R; Ayres K; Prestwich A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1727-40. PubMed ID: 18000106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are well-calibrated users effective users? Associations between calibration of trust and performance on an automation-aided task.
    Merritt SM; Lee D; Unnerstall JL; Huber K
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 25790569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influencing Trust for Human-Automation Collaborative Scheduling of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles.
    Clare AS; Cummings ML; Repenning NP
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1208-18. PubMed ID: 26060238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward gay males and lesbians among heterosexual males and females.
    Breen AB; Karpinski A
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(3):351-74. PubMed ID: 23724704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliance on Haptic Assistance Reflected in Haptic Cue Weighting.
    Gibo TL; Plaisier MA; Mugge W; Abbink DA
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2019; 12(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 30106693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trustworthiness and IT suspicion: an evaluation of the nomological network.
    Lyons JB; Stokes CK; Eschleman KJ; Alarcon GM; Barelka AJ
    Hum Factors; 2011 Jun; 53(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 21830509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implicit attitudes in sexuality: gender differences.
    Geer JH; Robertson GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Dec; 34(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 16362251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Affective processes in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM
    Hum Factors; 2011 Aug; 53(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 21901933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do you think about ink? An examination of implicit and explicit attitudes toward tattooed individuals.
    Zestcott CA; Tompkins TL; Kozak Williams M; Livesay K; Chan KL
    J Soc Psychol; 2018; 158(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 28375810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration.
    Parasuraman R; Manzey DH
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):381-410. PubMed ID: 21077562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automation bias: empirical results assessing influencing factors.
    Goddard K; Roudsari A; Wyatt JC
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 May; 83(5):368-75. PubMed ID: 24581700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Categorization and Prediction of Crimes of Passion Based on Attitudes Toward Violence.
    Guan M; Li X; Xiao W; Miao D; Liu X
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2017 Nov; 61(15):1775-1790. PubMed ID: 27240818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward rape are associated with sexual aggression.
    Nunes KL; Hermann CA; Ratcliffe K
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Sep; 28(13):2657-75. PubMed ID: 23761302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of implicit attitude measures to the blood donation context.
    Warfel RM; France CR; France JL
    Transfusion; 2012 Feb; 52(2):356-65. PubMed ID: 21827501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who owns implicit attitudes? Testing a metacognitive perspective.
    Cooley E; Payne BK; Loersch C; Lei R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 41(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 25422315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.