These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23829039)

  • 1. Evaluation of wearable simulation interface for military training.
    Taylor GS; Barnett JS
    Hum Factors; 2013 Jun; 55(3):672-90. PubMed ID: 23829039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of a surgical training simulator with haptic feedback for learning bone-sawing skill.
    Lin Y; Wang X; Wu F; Chen X; Wang C; Shen G
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():122-9. PubMed ID: 24380817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design, Realization, and First Validation of an Immersive Web-Based Virtual Patient Simulator for Training Clinical Decisions in Surgery.
    Kleinert R; Heiermann N; Wahba R; Chang DH; Hölscher AH; Stippel DL
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26094909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usability Comparisons of Head-Mounted vs. Stereoscopic Desktop Displays in a Virtual Reality Environment with Pain Patients.
    Tong X; Gromala D; Gupta D; Squire P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():424-31. PubMed ID: 27046617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence.
    Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 May; 78(5):340-53. PubMed ID: 19046928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The interaction of spatial ability and motor learning in the transfer of training from a simulator to a real task.
    Tracey MR; Lathan CE
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():521-7. PubMed ID: 11317801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
    Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
    World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glasses-type wearable computer displays: usability considerations examined with a 3D glasses case study.
    Chang J; Moon SK; Jung K; Kim W; Parkinson M; Freivalds A; Simpson TW; Baik SP
    Ergonomics; 2018 May; 61(5):670-681. PubMed ID: 29103342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of computer simulation training for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Pilot study.
    Sedlack RE
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Aug; 22(8):1214-9. PubMed ID: 17559386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Teaching tactical combat casualty care using the TC3 sim game-based simulation: a study to measure training effectiveness.
    Sotomayor TM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 154():176-9. PubMed ID: 20543293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course].
    Lehmann KS; Gröne J; Lauscher JC; Ritz JP; Holmer C; Pohlen U; Buhr HJ
    Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Apr; 137(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 22495487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Simulator sickness as a valid issue of simulator-based research].
    Biernacki M; Dziuda Ł
    Med Pr; 2012; 63(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 22880458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness evaluation of simulative workshops for newly licensed drivers.
    Rosenbloom T; Eldror E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Feb; 63():30-6. PubMed ID: 24252555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining the Usability of Touch Screen Gestures for Older and Younger Adults.
    Gao Q; Sun Q
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):835-63. PubMed ID: 25957042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training for percutaneous renal access on a virtual reality simulator.
    Zhang Y; Yu CF; Liu JS; Wang G; Zhu H; Na YQ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(8):1528-31. PubMed ID: 23595389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room.
    Korndorffer JR; Dunne JB; Sierra R; Stefanidis D; Touchard CL; Scott DJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Jul; 201(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15978440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Augmented reality as an aid in maxillofacial surgery: validation of a wearable system allowing maxillary repositioning.
    Badiali G; Ferrari V; Cutolo F; Freschi C; Caramella D; Bianchi A; Marchetti C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1970-6. PubMed ID: 25441867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Military teams - A demand for resilience.
    Mjelde FV; Smith K; Lunde P; Espevik R
    Work; 2016 May; 54(2):283-94. PubMed ID: 27259180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of virtual reality-simulated training on urology residents' performance of transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Källström R; Hjertberg H; Svanvik J
    J Endourol; 2010 Sep; 24(9):1521-8. PubMed ID: 20677993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality.
    Munz Y; Almoudaris AM; Moorthy K; Dosis A; Liddle AD; Darzi AW
    Am J Surg; 2007 Jun; 193(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 17512295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.