These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23829809)

  • 21. Systematic reviews in nutrition: standardized methodology.
    Wanden-Berghe C; Sanz-Valero J
    Br J Nutr; 2012 Jun; 107 Suppl 2():S3-7. PubMed ID: 22591902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach.
    Cook DA; West CP
    Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 46(10):943-52. PubMed ID: 22989128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: scientific rationale and interpretation.
    Ferreira González I; Urrútia G; Alonso-Coello P
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):688-96. PubMed ID: 21719182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals.
    Parsons NR; Hiskens R; Price CL; Achten J; Costa ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1154-9. PubMed ID: 21911523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Getting to grips with systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Davies HT; Crombie IK
    Hosp Med; 1998 Dec; 59(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 10696361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: a case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders.
    Weir MC; Grimshaw JM; Mayhew A; Fergusson D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):756-63. PubMed ID: 22498429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing equity in systematic reviews: realising the recommendations of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health.
    Tugwell P; Petticrew M; Kristjansson E; Welch V; Ueffing E; Waters E; Bonnefoy J; Morgan A; Doohan E; Kelly MP
    BMJ; 2010 Sep; 341():c4739. PubMed ID: 20837575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Searching for systematic reviews.
    Murdoch NH
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2004; 14(3):152-4, 156-9. PubMed ID: 15379374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using systematic reviews.
    Lipp A
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2007 Nov; 14(7):30-2. PubMed ID: 18038835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Promoting development and use of systematic reviews in a developing country.
    Yousefi-Nooraie R; Rashidian A; Nedjat S; Majdzadeh R; Mortaz-Hedjri S; Etemadi A; Salmasian H
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 20367702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Brozek JL; Montori VM; Heffner J; Hill S; Woodhead M; Campos-Outcalt D; Alderson P; Woitalla T; Puhan MA; Falck-Ytter Y; Bousquet J; Guyatt G;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 23256172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Learning from the past: refining the way we study treatments.
    Viechtbauer W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):980-2. PubMed ID: 20573485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy interventions for older adults with low vision.
    Arbesman M; Lieberman D; Berlanstein DR
    Am J Occup Ther; 2013; 67(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 23597684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses)].
    Walther S; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1106-10. PubMed ID: 22144064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reconciling systematic reviews of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programmes for coronary heart disease.
    Jelinek M; Clark AM; Oldridge NB; Briffa TG; Thompson DR
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2011 Apr; 18(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 21450660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can you see the wood for the trees? Making sense of forest plots in systematic reviews 2. Analysis of the combined results from the included studies.
    Hyde CJ; Stanworth SJ; Murphy MF
    Transfusion; 2008 Apr; 48(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 18194387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results.
    Hopewell S; Wolfenden L; Clarke M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 18411039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What can systematic reviews teach us in anaesthesia?
    Tramèr MR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl; 1997; 111():235-6. PubMed ID: 9421028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.