These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23829866)

  • 1. Lexical decision and the number of morphemes and affixes.
    Muncer SJ; Knight DC; Adams JW
    Scand J Psychol; 2013 Oct; 54(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 23829866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bigram frequency, number of syllables and morphemes and their effects on lexical decision and word naming.
    Muncer SJ; Knight D; Adams JW
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Jun; 43(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 23613200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision.
    Muncer SJ; Knight DC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2221-30. PubMed ID: 22804754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects.
    Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1267-89. PubMed ID: 20804296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
    Yap MJ; Sibley DE; Balota DA; Ratcliff R; Rueckl J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):597-613. PubMed ID: 25329078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to say "no" to a nonword: a leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision.
    Dufau S; Grainger J; Ziegler JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1117-28. PubMed ID: 22746955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decomposition: to what extent? The case of Turkish.
    Gürel A
    Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):218-24. PubMed ID: 10433762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emphasizing nonword decisions in word-decision performance.
    Piercey CD
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Aug; 103(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 18982942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: the role of the item frequency of the previous trial.
    Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 12745840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming.
    Binder JR; Medler DA; Desai R; Conant LL; Liebenthal E
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):677-93. PubMed ID: 15921937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Instructions and word bias in a lexical decision task.
    Piercey CD
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Jun; 96(3 Pt 2):995-1001. PubMed ID: 16173368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonword repetition priming in lexical decision reverses as a function of study task and speed stress.
    Zeelenberg R; Wagenmakers EJ; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):270-7. PubMed ID: 14736311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexical morphology and lexical access.
    Vannest J; Boland JE
    Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):324-32. PubMed ID: 10433777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Syllable transposition effects in korean word recognition.
    Lee CH; Kwon Y; Kim K; Rastle K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Jun; 44(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 25694048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive style and the reading process: field-dependence differences on a lexical-decision task.
    Davies MF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Jun; 78(3 Pt 2):1195-8. PubMed ID: 7936943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
    Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
    Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.