These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23829976)

  • 1. "I think it depends on the body, with mine it didn't work": explaining young women's contraceptive implant removal.
    Hoggart L; Newton VL; Dickson J
    Contraception; 2013 Nov; 88(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 23829976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal.
    Haugen MM; Evans CB; Kim MH
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 8951137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.
    Ireland LD; Goyal V; Raker CA; Murray A; Allen RH
    Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 24973904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Satisfaction, early removal, and side effects associated with long-acting reversible contraception.
    Dickerson LM; Diaz VA; Jordon J; Davis E; Chirina S; Goddard JA; Carr KB; Carek PJ
    Fam Med; 2013; 45(10):701-7. PubMed ID: 24347187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The introduction of a new contraceptive; two years experience with Norplant.
    Davie J; Hiremath K; Glasier A
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1996 Jul; 54(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 8783485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low-income women.
    Kalmuss D; Davidson AR; Cushman LF; Heartwell S; Rulin M
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(6):256-60. PubMed ID: 8959415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Australian women's experience with Implanon.
    Weisberg E; Fraser I
    Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Aug; 34(8):694-6. PubMed ID: 16113711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A qualitative study of the perceptions of dissatisfied Norplant users.
    Musham C; Darr EG; Strossner ML
    J Fam Pract; 1995 May; 40(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 7730770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Just Wear Dark Underpants Mainly": Learning from Adolescents' and Young Adults' Experiences with Early Discontinuation of the Contraceptive Implant.
    Lunde B; Littman L; Stimmel S; Rana R; Jacobs A; Horowitz CR
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 30(3):395-399. PubMed ID: 28069493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-year assessment of women receiving sub-dermal contraceptive implant at Siriraj Family Planning Clinic.
    Thamkhantho M; Jivasak-Apimas S; Angsuwathana S; Chiravacharadej G; Intawong J
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91(6):775-80. PubMed ID: 18697372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Young women's experiences of side-effects from contraceptive implants: a challenge to bodily control.
    Hoggart L; Newton VL
    Reprod Health Matters; 2013 May; 21(41):196-204. PubMed ID: 23684202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate postpartum etonogestrel implant: a contraception option with long-term continuation.
    Wilson S; Tennant C; Sammel MD; Schreiber C
    Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 24993485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implanon users are less likely to be satisfied with their contraception after 6 months than IUD users.
    Wong RC; Bell RJ; Thunuguntla K; McNamee K; Vollenhoven B
    Contraception; 2009 Nov; 80(5):452-6. PubMed ID: 19835719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel.
    Funk S; Miller MM; Mishell DR; Archer DF; Poindexter A; Schmidt J; Zampaglione E;
    Contraception; 2005 May; 71(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 15854630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patients' perspectives about why they have their contraceptive Implanon NXT device removed early.
    Flore M; Chen XL; Bonney A; Mullan J; Dijkmans-Hadley B; Hodgkins A; Evans G; Frew H; Lloyd G
    Aust Fam Physician; 2016 Oct; 45(10):740-744. PubMed ID: 27695725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasons for requesting removal of the hormonal implant, Implanon NXT, at an urban reproductive health clinic in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
    Beesham I; Smit J; Beksinska M; Panday M; Makatini V; Evans S
    S Afr Med J; 2019 Sep; 109(10):750-755. PubMed ID: 31635572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Australian women's experiences of the subdermal contraceptive implant: A qualitative perspective.
    Inoue K; Kelly M; Barrett A; Bateson D; Black KI; Stewart M; Richters J
    Aust Fam Physician; 2016 Oct; 45(10):734-739. PubMed ID: 27695724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implanon: a new contraceptive implant.
    Fischer MA
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2008; 37(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 18507609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urban adolescent females' views on the implant and contraceptive decision-making: a double paradox.
    Kuiper H; Miller S; Martinez E; Loeb L; Darney P
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 9258648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Side effects and acceptability of Implanon: a pilot study conducted in eastern Turkey.
    Yildizbas B; Sahin HG; Kolusari A; Zeteroglu S; Kamaci M
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2007 Sep; 12(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 17763263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.