160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23830225)
1. Words of wisdom: re: transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Ravery V
Eur Urol; 2013 Aug; 64(2):337. PubMed ID: 23830225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Kasivisvanathan V; Dufour R; Moore CM; Ahmed HU; Abd-Alazeez M; Charman SC; Freeman A; Allen C; Kirkham A; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):860-6. PubMed ID: 23063807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Editorial comment.
Labanaris AP
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):866. PubMed ID: 23261235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Words of wisdom. Re: Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: MRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy.
Villers A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1218-9. PubMed ID: 24774825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: Transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy using a modified technique: outcome of 270 cases requiring repeat prostate biopsy.
Taneja SS
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1245-6. PubMed ID: 24029308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy Improves Selection of Patients Considered for Active Surveillance for Clinically Low Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Systematic Biopsies.
Ouzzane A; Renard-Penna R; Marliere F; Mozer P; Olivier J; Barkatz J; Puech P; Villers A
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):350-6. PubMed ID: 25747105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Manual prostate cancer segmentation in MRI: interreader agreement and volumetric correlation with transperineal template core needle biopsy.
Liechti MR; Muehlematter UJ; Schneider AF; Eberli D; Rupp NJ; Hötker AM; Donati OF; Becker AS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4806-4815. PubMed ID: 32306078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transperineal limited-mapping prostatic biopsies to diagnose prostate cancer: a Scottish experience.
Mukherjee A; Morton S; Fraser S; Salmond J; Baxter G; Leung HY
Scott Med J; 2014 Nov; 59(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 25314954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re: To biopsy or not to biopsy: minimizing the risk of prostate needle biopsy: A. S. Kibel J Urol 2013; 189: 796-797.
Horan AH
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):1139. PubMed ID: 23583228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up MR imaging of PI-RADS 3 and PI-RADS 4 prostate lesions.
Hauth E; Jaeger H; Hohmuth H; Beer M
Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():64-68. PubMed ID: 28196759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.
Cash H; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Holzmann J; Asbach P; Haas M; Hinz S; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Günzel K; Kempkensteffen C
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 26293117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. To biopsy or not to biopsy: minimizing the risk of prostate needle biopsy.
Kibel AS
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):796-7. PubMed ID: 23246850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of lesions detected and undetected by template-guided transperineal saturation prostate biopsy.
Mai Z; Xiao Y; Yan W; Zhou Y; Zhou Z; Liang Z; Ji Z; Li H
BJU Int; 2018 Mar; 121(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 28771912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First report of robot-assisted transperineal fusion versus off-target biopsy in patients undergoing repeat prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann S; Mischinger J; Amend B; Rausch S; Adam M; Scharpf M; Fend F; Kramer U; Notohamiprodjo M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kruck S
World J Urol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 27847972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Re: Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy: A. R. Rastinehad, B. Turkbey, S. S. Salami, O. Yaskiv, A. K. George, M. Fakhoury, K. Beecher, M. A. Vira, L. R. Kavoussi, D. N. Siegel, R. Villani and E. Ben-Levi. J Urol 2014; 191: 1749-1754.
Patodia M; Goel A; Kumar M
J Urol; 2014 Dec; 192(6):1888; discussion 1888-9. PubMed ID: 25194541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Value of Different Systematic Prostate Biopsy Methods in the Detection of Prostate Cancer with Ultrasonographic Hypoechoic Lesions--A Comparative Study.
Xu G; Yao M; Wu J; Guo L; Feng L; Wang S; Zhao L; Xu H; Wu R
Urol Int; 2015; 95(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 26113049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High diagnostic ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect anterior prostate cancer missed by transrectal 12-core biopsy.
Komai Y; Numao N; Yoshida S; Matsuoka Y; Nakanishi Y; Ishii C; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):867-73. PubMed ID: 23542406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison Between a Combined Transrectal and Transperineal Approach and a Transrectal Approach for Prostate Rebiopsy.
Shida Y; Hakariya T; Takehara K; Onita T; Miyata Y; Sakai H
Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4685-90. PubMed ID: 27630313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
