These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23830353)

  • 1. Development of maternity dashboards across a UK health region; current practice, continuing problems.
    Simms RA; Ping H; Yelland A; Beringer AJ; Fox R; Draycott TJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 23830353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation and implementation of local maternity dashboards in a Zimbabwean hospital to drive clinical improvement.
    Crofts J; Moyo J; Ndebele W; Mhlanga S; Draycott T; Sibanda T
    Bull World Health Organ; 2014 Feb; 92(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 24623908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using data and quality monitoring to enhance maternity outcomes: a qualitative study of risk managers' perspectives.
    Simms RA; Yelland A; Ping H; Beringer AJ; Draycott TJ; Fox R
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Jun; 23(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 24319101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality indicator development and implementation in maternity units.
    Boulkedid R; Alberti C; Sibony O
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):609-19. PubMed ID: 23642350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic approach towards the development of a set of quality indicators for public reporting in community-based maternity care.
    Voerman GE; Calsbeek H; Maassen IT; Wiegers TA; Braspenning J
    Midwifery; 2013 Apr; 29(4):316-24. PubMed ID: 23357096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical risk management study day review.
    Andrews S
    RCM Midwives; 2002 Nov; 5(11):366-7. PubMed ID: 12478689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring quality of maternity care.
    Collins KJ; Draycott T
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Nov; 29(8):1132-8. PubMed ID: 25913563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Leeds University Maternity Audit Project.
    Wilson B; Thornton JG; Hewison J; Lilford RJ; Watt I; Braunholtz D; Robinson M
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 12108528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How can maternity services be developed to effectively address maternal obesity? A qualitative study.
    Heslehurst N; Moore H; Rankin J; Ells LJ; Wilkinson JR; Summberbell CD
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):e170-7. PubMed ID: 20188447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Best practices for developing cardiovascular quality indicators.
    Tu JV; Abrahamyan L; Donovan LR; Boom N;
    Can J Cardiol; 2013 Nov; 29(11):1516-9. PubMed ID: 23962730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing a set of consensus indicators to support maternity service quality improvement: using Core Outcome Set methodology including a Delphi process.
    Bunch KJ; Allin B; Jolly M; Hardie T; Knight M
    BJOG; 2018 Nov; 125(12):1612-1618. PubMed ID: 29770557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GP obstetricians' views of the model of maternity care in New Zealand.
    Miller DL; Mason Z; Jaye C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Feb; 53(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 23405995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collaboration in maternity care: possibilities and challenges.
    Waldman R; Kennedy HP; Kendig S
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2012 Sep; 39(3):435-44. PubMed ID: 22963702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maternity services in the UK during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a national survey of modifications to standard care.
    Jardine J; Relph S; Magee LA; von Dadelszen P; Morris E; Ross-Davie M; Draycott T; Khalil A
    BJOG; 2021 Apr; 128(5):880-889. PubMed ID: 32992408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of maternity unit closures on access to obstetrical care: the French experience between 1998 and 2003.
    Pilkington H; Blondel B; Carayol M; Breart G; Zeitlin J
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Nov; 67(10):1521-9. PubMed ID: 18757128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and Implementation of Maternity Dashboard in Regional Hospital for Quality Improvement at Ground Level: A Pilot Study.
    Patel MS; Rathi B; Tashfeen K; Yarubi MA
    Oman Med J; 2019 May; 34(3):194-199. PubMed ID: 31110625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How midwives' discursive practices contribute to the maintenance of the status quo in English maternity care.
    Pollard KC
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):612-9. PubMed ID: 20692743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of the Kirkup report.
    Midwives; 2015; 18():51-3. PubMed ID: 26197666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Whose evidence counts? An exploration of health professionals' perceptions of evidence-based practice, focusing on the maternity services.
    Stewart M
    Midwifery; 2001 Dec; 17(4):279-88. PubMed ID: 11749060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.