These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23830607)

  • 21. Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: the effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters.
    Alkadhi H; Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Desbiolles L; Baumüller S; Plass A; Genoni M; Marincek B; Leschka S
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 18976876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact on image quality and radiation exposure in coronary CT angiography: 100 kVp versus 120 kVp.
    Ripsweden J; Brismar TB; Holm J; Melinder A; Mir-Akbari H; Nilsson T; Nyman U; Rasmussen E; Rück A; Cederlund K
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):903-9. PubMed ID: 20735275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic performance of high-definition coronary computed tomography angiography performed with multiple radiation dose reduction strategies.
    Heydari B; Leipsic J; Mancini GB; Min JK; Labounty T; Taylor C; Freue GV; Heilbron B
    Can J Cardiol; 2011; 27(5):606-12. PubMed ID: 21963057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Low-concentration contrast medium for 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography at a very low radiation dose using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition.
    Zheng M; Wu Y; Wei M; Liu Y; Zhao H; Li J
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 25457735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimated radiation dose and image quality comparison of the scan protocols in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Karaarslan E; Ulus S; Bavbek C
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Aug; 57(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 23870335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: uncompromised quality with markedly reduced radiation exposure in acute chest pain evaluation.
    Goitein O; Beigel R; Matetzky S; Kuperstein R; Brosh S; Eshet Y; Di Segni E; Konen E
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2011 Aug; 13(8):463-7. PubMed ID: 21910369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Progressive radiation dose reduction from coronary computed tomography angiography in a statewide collaborative quality improvement program: results from the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium.
    Chinnaiyan KM; Boura JA; DePetris A; Gentry R; Abidov A; Share DA; Raff GL;
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):646-54. PubMed ID: 23926193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Low-dose, prospective triggered high-pitch spiral coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with retrospective spiral technique.
    Srichai MB; Lim RP; Donnino R; Mannelli L; Hiralal R; Avery R; Ho C; Babb JS; Jacobs JE
    Acad Radiol; 2012 May; 19(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 22366557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effective radiation dose of three diagnostic tests in cardiology: single photon emission computed tomography, invasive coronary angiography and cardiac computed tomography angiography.
    de Araújo Gonçalves P; Jerónimo Sousa P; Calé R; Marques H; Borges dos Santos M; Dias A; Dores H; Carvalho MS; Ventosa A; Martins T; Campante Teles R; Almeida M; Mendes M
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 32(12):981-6. PubMed ID: 24287017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography.
    Hausleiter J; Meyer T; Hermann F; Hadamitzky M; Krebs M; Gerber TC; McCollough C; Martinoff S; Kastrati A; Schömig A; Achenbach S
    JAMA; 2009 Feb; 301(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 19190314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels in cardiac CT in France: a need for patient dose optimisation.
    Mafalanka F; Etard C; Rehel JL; Pesenti-Rossi D; Amrar-Vennier F; Baron N; Christiaens L; Convers-Domart R; Defez D; Douek P; Gaxotte V; Georges JL; Leygnac S; Ou P; Sablayrolles JL; Salvat C; Schouman-Claeys E; Sirol M; Aubert B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):116-9. PubMed ID: 25342609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. First experience with 320-row multidetector CT coronary angiography scanning with prospective electrocardiogram gating to reduce radiation dose.
    Hoe J; Toh KH
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 19577215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiation dose in a "triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index.
    Takakuwa KM; Halpern EJ; Gingold EL; Levin DC; Shofer FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):866-72. PubMed ID: 19304688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT coronary angiography: a systematic review of radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.
    Sun Z; Ng KH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):e94-100. PubMed ID: 21316887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography using low tube voltage of 80 kV in subjects with normal body mass indices: comparative study using 120 kV.
    Jun BR; Yong HS; Kang EY; Woo OH; Choi EJ
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1099-106. PubMed ID: 23034796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Real-world estimated effective radiation doses from commonly used cardiac testing and procedural modalities.
    Scott-Moncrieff A; Yang J; Levine D; Taylor C; Tso D; Johnson M; Heilbron B; Leipsic J
    Can J Cardiol; 2011; 27(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 21652170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A quality improvement project for reducing cardiac computed tomography radiation dose in a community-based, multihospital setting.
    Winchester DE; Chauffe RJ; Liu T; Badiye A; Patel M; Bello D
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 12(2):49-52. PubMed ID: 23680808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Achieving consistent image quality and overall radiation dose reduction for coronary CT angiography with body mass index-dependent tube voltage and tube current selection.
    Wang G; Gao J; Zhao S; Sun X; Chen X; Cui X
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Sep; 69(9):945-51. PubMed ID: 24909505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Coronary CT angiography for acute chest pain triage: techniques for radiation exposure reduction; 128 vs. 64 multidetector CT.
    Goitein O; Matetzky S; Eshet Y; Goitein D; Hamdan A; Segni ED; Konen E
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Oct; 52(8):840-5. PubMed ID: 21840965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prospective national survey of coronary CT angiography radiation doses in the United Kingdom.
    Castellano IA; Nicol ED; Bull RK; Roobottom CA; Williams MC; Harden SP
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(4):268-273. PubMed ID: 28532693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.