These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23830639)

  • 1. Quantitative analysis of digital subtraction angiography using optical flow method on occlusive cerebrovascular disease.
    Wu TH; Lin CJ; Lin YH; Guo WY; Huang TC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Sep; 111(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 23830639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative flow measurement by digital subtraction angiography in cerebral carotid stenosis using optical flow method.
    Huang TC; Wu TH; Lin YH; Guo WY; Huang WC; Lin CJ
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 23694912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
    Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.
    Nael K; Villablanca JP; Pope WB; McNamara TO; Laub G; Finn JP
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 17255428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peritherapeutic quantitative flow analysis of arteriovenous malformation on digital subtraction angiography.
    Huang TC; Wu TH; Lin CJ; Mok GS; Guo WY
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Sep; 56(3):812-5. PubMed ID: 22560309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemodynamic analysis of vascular stenting treatment outcome: computational fluid dynamics method vs optical flow method.
    Shih TC; Lin YH; Ho YJ; Hsiao HD; Huang YH; Huang TC
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2012; 20(4):469-81. PubMed ID: 23324787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    van den Bosch HC; Westenberg JJ; Caris R; Duijm LE; Tielbeek AV; Cuypers PW; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):337-46. PubMed ID: 23143021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flow impairment during filter-protected carotid artery stent placement: frame-by-frame evaluation of digital subtraction angiography images.
    Sorimachi T; Nishino K; Morita K; Sasaki O; Koike T; Ito Y; Fujii Y
    World Neurosurg; 2011; 76(3-4):282-7; discussion 250-2. PubMed ID: 21986425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implication of cerebral circulation time in intracranial stenosis measured by digital subtraction angiography on cerebral blood flow estimation measured by arterial spin labeling.
    Jann K; Hauf M; Kellner Weldon F; El Koussy M; Kiefer C; Federspiel A; Schroth G
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2016; 22(5):481-8. PubMed ID: 27411297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Perioperative evaluation of internal carotid artery stenoses: value of multislab MR angiography].
    Vogl TJ; Kutter RW; Schön K; Juergens M; Hepp W; Balzer JO; Steger W; Felix R
    Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(12):1023-32. PubMed ID: 9092222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of hyperperfusion phenomenon after carotid artery stenting and carotid angioplasty using quantitative DSA with cerebral circulation time imaging.
    Yamauchi K; Enomoto Y; Otani K; Egashira Y; Iwama T
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2018 Jun; 10(6):576-579. PubMed ID: 28866638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography of the epiaortic vessels].
    Carriero A; Salute L; Toppetti A; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1991 Jun; 81(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 1857782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
    Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluoroscopic angiography quantifies delay in cerebral circulation time and requires less radiation in carotid stenosis patients: A pilot study.
    Chu WF; Lee HJ; Lin CJ; Chang FC; Guo WY; Chen LW; Lin YY; Luo CB
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 May; 82(5):396-400. PubMed ID: 30893249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA.
    Bonel HM; Saar B; Hoppe H; Keo HH; Husmann M; Nikolaou K; Ludwig K; Szucs-Farkas Z; Srivastav S; Kickuth R
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):879-90. PubMed ID: 19864508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
    Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of asymmetry in cerebral blood flow between brain hemispheres using digital subtraction angiography.
    Divani AA; Qureshi AI; Hoffman KR; Suri MF; Kirmani JF
    J Neuroimaging; 2006 Apr; 16(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16629736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intracranial venous sinus stenosis: hemodynamic assessment with two-dimensional parametric parenchymal blood flow software on digital subtraction angiography.
    Almadidy Z; Brunozzi D; Nelson J; Baumgart J; Atwal G; Alaraj A
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2020 Mar; 12(3):311-314. PubMed ID: 31772041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic flow analysis of digital subtraction angiography using independent component analysis in patients with carotid stenosis.
    Lee HJ; Hong JS; Lin CJ; Kao YH; Chang FC; Luo CB; Chu WF
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185330. PubMed ID: 28949999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.