BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23830887)

  • 1. Method of median semi-variance for the analysis of left-censored data: comparison with other techniques using environmental data.
    Zoffoli HJ; Varella CA; do Amaral-Sobrinho NM; Zonta E; Tolón-Becerra A
    Chemosphere; 2013 Nov; 93(9):1701-9. PubMed ID: 23830887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
    Ganser GH; Hewett P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit.
    Succop PA; Clark S; Chen M; Galke W
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 15238313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating Left-Censored Data Through Substitution, Parametric, Semi-parametric, and Nonparametric Methods: A Simulation Study.
    Tekindal MA; Erdoğan BD; Yavuz Y
    Interdiscip Sci; 2017 Jun; 9(2):153-172. PubMed ID: 26590921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of techniques for assessing central tendency in left-censored data using PCB and p,p'DDE contaminant concentrations from Michigan's Bald Eagle Biosentinel Program.
    Leith KF; Bowerman WW; Wierda MR; Best DA; Grubb TG; Sikarske JG
    Chemosphere; 2010 Jun; 80(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 20416924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of censored exposure data by constrained maximization of the Shapiro-Wilk W statistic.
    Flynn MR
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 19955326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating correlation with multiply censored data arising from the adjustment of singly censored data.
    Newton E; Rudel R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 17265951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of different parametric proportional hazards models for interval-censored data: a simulation study.
    Gong Q; Fang L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 23916917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analysis of left-censored quantitative outcome: example of procalcitonin level].
    Asselineau J; Thiébaut R; Perez P; Pinganaud G; Chêne G
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2007 Jun; 55(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 17467942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the agreement of biomarker data in the presence of left-censoring.
    Domthong U; Parikh CR; Kimmel PL; Chinchilli VM;
    BMC Nephrol; 2014 Sep; 15():144. PubMed ID: 25186769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating variance parameters from multivariate normal variables subject to limit of detection: MLE, REML, or Bayesian approaches?
    Nie L; Chu H; Feng S
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2605-16. PubMed ID: 19598183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
    Canales RA; Wilson AM; Pearce-Walker JI; Verhougstraete MP; Reynolds KA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30120116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of censoring on learning Bayesian networks in survival modelling.
    Stajduhar I; Dalbelo-Basić B; Bogunović N
    Artif Intell Med; 2009 Nov; 47(3):199-217. PubMed ID: 19833488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility and imputation of air toxics data.
    Le HQ; Batterman SA; Wahl RL
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Dec; 9(12):1358-72. PubMed ID: 18049775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of methods for managing censored results when calculating the geometric mean.
    Mikkonen HG; Clarke BO; Dasika R; Wallis CJ; Reichman SM
    Chemosphere; 2018 Jan; 191():412-416. PubMed ID: 29049962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analyses of cumulative incidence functions via non-parametric multiple imputation.
    Ruan PK; Gray RJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(27):5709-24. PubMed ID: 18712779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods for analysis of censored tumor growth delay data.
    Stuschke M; Budach V; Bamberg M; Budach W
    Radiat Res; 1990 May; 122(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 2336463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple imputation for left-censored biomarker data based on Gibbs sampling method.
    Lee M; Kong L; Weissfeld L
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(17):1838-48. PubMed ID: 22359320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.