These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2383212)

  • 21. Compound action potential and cochlear microphonic extracted from electrocochleographic responses to condensation or rarefaction clicks.
    Arslan E; Santarelli R; Sparacino G; Sella G
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11603770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sectioning the efferent bundle decreases cochlear frequency selectivity.
    Carlier E; Pujol R
    Neurosci Lett; 1982 Jan; 28(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 7063139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Compound action potentials recorded from the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve in man: effects of stimulus intensity and polarity.
    Møller AR; Jho HD
    Audiology; 1991; 30(3):142-63. PubMed ID: 1953444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enhancement of the cochlear nerve compound action potential: sharply defined frequency-intensity domains bordering the tuning curve.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1991 Nov; 56(1-2):239-45. PubMed ID: 1769917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory steady-state evoked potentials vs. compound action potentials for the measurement of suppression tuning curves in the sedated dog puppy.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Hoonhorst I; Collet G; Deltenre P; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 20482293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Latency enhancement of the cochlear nerve compound action potential (CAP).
    Price JM; Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1992 Nov; 63(1-2):97-101. PubMed ID: 1464580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Audibility, speech perception and processing of temporal cues in ribbon synaptic disorders due to OTOF mutations.
    Santarelli R; del Castillo I; Cama E; Scimemi P; Starr A
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt B):200-12. PubMed ID: 26188103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Short latency compound action potentials from mammalian gravity receptor organs.
    Jones TA; Jones SM
    Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):75-85. PubMed ID: 10511626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mapping auditory nerve firing density using high-level compound action potentials and high-pass noise masking.
    Earl BR; Chertoff ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):337-52. PubMed ID: 22280596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.
    Johnson TA; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Hoover BM; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3263-6. PubMed ID: 15658675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Frequency selectivity in the auditory periphery: similarities between damaged and developing ears.
    Walsh EJ; McGee J
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1990; 11(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2321707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency selectivity of single cochlear-nerve fibers based on the temporal response pattern to two-tone signals.
    Greenberg S; Geisler CD; Deng L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 3700856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Location-specific components of the gross cochlear action potential: an assessment of the validity of the high-pass masking technique by cochlear nerve fibre recording in the cat.
    Evans EF; Elberling C
    Audiology; 1982; 21(3):204-27. PubMed ID: 7092725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cochlear potentials in the Bronx waltzer mutant mouse.
    Bock GR; Yates GK; Deol MS
    Neurosci Lett; 1982 Dec; 34(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 6298667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.
    Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1412-26. PubMed ID: 2229676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Brain-stem auditory-evoked responses elicited by maximum length sequences: effect of simultaneous masking noise.
    Burkard R; Shi Y; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1665-72. PubMed ID: 2341670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of cochlear hearing loss and probe tone level on compound action potential tuning curves in humans.
    Rutten WL
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 3722003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.