BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2383213)

  • 1. Cochlear threshold assessment using tone-derived action potentials.
    Salt AN; Vora AR
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 2383213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear action potential tuning curves recorded with a derived response technique.
    Salt AN; Garcia P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1392-402. PubMed ID: 2229674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latency and amplitude tuning curves of the N1 and N2 components of the cochlear nerve compound action potential.
    Henry KR; Sweet RJ; Price JM
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):122-34. PubMed ID: 2383212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new auditory threshold estimation technique for low frequencies: proof of concept.
    Lichtenhan JT; Cooper NP; Guinan JJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 22874644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.
    Purdy SC; Houghton JM; Keith WJ; Greville KA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2930366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AP tuning curves from normal and pathological human and guinea pig cochleas.
    Harrison RV; Aran JM; Erre JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 May; 69(5):1374-85. PubMed ID: 7240567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency extent of two-tone facilitation in onset units in the ventral cochlear nucleus.
    Jiang D; Palmer AR; Winter IM
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jan; 75(1):380-95. PubMed ID: 8822565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF responses is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 4055531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Frequency-dependent cochlear microphonics in inner ear hearing loss with various pitch thresholds].
    Marangos N; Hesse G; Mausolf A
    HNO; 1989 Jan; 37(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 2917880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some otological differences between pigmented and albino-type guinea pigs.
    Harrison RV; Palmer A; Aran JM
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1984; 240(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 6487138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of compound action potential and cochlear microphonic two-tone suppression in the guinea pig.
    Remond MC; Harrison RV; Legouix JP
    Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 8(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 7142036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Offset AP masker tuning curve and the FFT of the stimulus.
    Henry KR; Lewis ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1354-62. PubMed ID: 3198871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms of tone-on-tone masking: patterns of discharge rate and discharge synchrony related to rates of spontaneous discharge in the chinchilla auditory nerve.
    Sinex DG; Havey DC
    J Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 56(6):1763-80. PubMed ID: 3806187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The frequency selectivity of the normal and pathological human cochlea.
    Harrison RV; Aran JM; Negrevergne M
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 7271565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
    Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modulation of cochlear tuning by low-frequency sound.
    Klis JF; Prijs VF; Latour JB; Smoorenburg GF
    Hear Res; 1988 Nov; 36(2-3):163-73. PubMed ID: 3209489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise masking of tone responses and critical ratios in single units of the mouse cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus.
    Ehret G; Moffat AJ
    Hear Res; 1984 Apr; 14(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 6746421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency selectivity of single cochlear-nerve fibers based on the temporal response pattern to two-tone signals.
    Greenberg S; Geisler CD; Deng L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 3700856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.