132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2383213)
21. [Properties of the derived cochlear action potential during tonal forward masking in guinea pigs].
Al'tman IaA; Nikitin NI
Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 1999 Jun; 85(6):751-66. PubMed ID: 10511996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Compound action potential and cochlear microphonic extracted from electrocochleographic responses to condensation or rarefaction clicks.
Arslan E; Santarelli R; Sparacino G; Sella G
Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11603770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Temporal factors associated with cochlear nerve tuning to dual and single tones: a qualitative study.
Henry KR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2272-9. PubMed ID: 10491691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds.
Long GR
Hear Res; 1984 Jul; 15(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 6480525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Location-specific components of the gross cochlear action potential: an assessment of the validity of the high-pass masking technique by cochlear nerve fibre recording in the cat.
Evans EF; Elberling C
Audiology; 1982; 21(3):204-27. PubMed ID: 7092725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
Henry KR
Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Development of cochlear amplification, frequency tuning, and two-tone suppression in the mouse.
Song L; McGee J; Walsh EJ
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):344-55. PubMed ID: 17989242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Neural representation of sound amplitude in the auditory cortex: effects of noise masking.
Phillips DP
Behav Brain Res; 1990 Mar; 37(3):197-214. PubMed ID: 2340096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sectioning the efferent bundle decreases cochlear frequency selectivity.
Carlier E; Pujol R
Neurosci Lett; 1982 Jan; 28(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 7063139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Suppression by tones of the click evoked compound action potential in the normal and pathological guinea-pig cochlea and in man.
Palmer AR; Harrison RV
Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 4023601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Lateral suppression and inhibition in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.
Rhode WS; Greenberg S
J Neurophysiol; 1994 Feb; 71(2):493-514. PubMed ID: 8176421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spectro-temporal analysis in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
Hall JW; Davis AC; Haggard MP; Pillsbury HC
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1325-31. PubMed ID: 3198867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The influence of cochlear hearing loss and probe tone level on compound action potential tuning curves in humans.
Rutten WL
Hear Res; 1986; 21(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 3722003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Suprathreshold comparisons of derived and enhanced compound action potentials.
Henry KR; Price JM
Hear Res; 1992 Nov; 63(1-2):90-6. PubMed ID: 1464579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.
Palmer AR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1412-26. PubMed ID: 2229676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modulation masking produced by complex tone modulators.
Verhey JL; Ewert SD; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2135-46. PubMed ID: 14587611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Derived and enhanced compound action potentials at near-threshold levels: forward masking increases sensitivity of audiograms and tuning curves.
Henry KR
Hear Res; 1992 Nov; 63(1-2):12-8. PubMed ID: 1464566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
