These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23832155)
1. Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientists' credibility. Jensen JD; Hurley RJ Public Underst Sci; 2012 Aug; 21(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 23832155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conflict or Caveats? Effects of Media Portrayals of Scientific Uncertainty on Audience Perceptions of New Technologies. Binder AR; Hillback ED; Brossard D Risk Anal; 2016 Apr; 36(4):831-46. PubMed ID: 26268067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science: An integrated explanatory framework. Ratcliff CL; Wicke R Public Underst Sci; 2023 May; 32(4):410-427. PubMed ID: 36196654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Exposure to Conflicting Information About Mammography on Cancer Information Overload, Perceived Scientists' Credibility, and Perceived Journalists' Credibility. Shi W; Rothman AJ; Yzer MC; Nagler RH Health Commun; 2023 Oct; 38(11):2481-2490. PubMed ID: 35607276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists. Barel-Ben David Y; Garty ES; Baram-Tsabari A PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0222250. PubMed ID: 31914124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 'There were some clues': a qualitative study of heuristics used by parents of adolescents to make credibility judgements of online health news articles citing research. Maggio LA; Krakow M; Moorhead LL BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e039692. PubMed ID: 32847924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Including limitations in news coverage of cancer research: effects of news hedging on fatalism, medical skepticism, patient trust, and backlash. Jensen JD; Carcioppolo N; King AJ; Bernat JK; Davis L; Yale R; Smith J J Health Commun; 2011 May; 16(5):486-503. PubMed ID: 21347947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting scientists' participation in public life. Besley JC; Oh SH; Nisbet M Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 23825262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pill and IUD discontinuation in the United States, 1970-1975: the influence of the media. Jones EF; Beniger JR; Westoff CF Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(6):293-300. PubMed ID: 7202692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Threat and efficacy uncertainty in news coverage about bed bugs as unique predictors of information seeking and avoidance: an extension of the EPPM. Goodall CE; Reed P Health Commun; 2013; 28(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 23330859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dangerous news: media decision making about climate change risk. Smith J Risk Anal; 2005 Dec; 25(6):1471-82. PubMed ID: 16506976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Turning free speech into corporate speech: Philip Morris' efforts to influence U.S. and European journalists regarding the U.S. EPA report on secondhand smoke. Muggli ME; Hurt RD; Becker LB Prev Med; 2004 Sep; 39(3):568-80. PubMed ID: 15313097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mobile knowledge and the media: The movement of scientific information in the context of environmental controversy. Bocking S Public Underst Sci; 2012 Aug; 21(6):705-23. PubMed ID: 23832156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Language and values in the human cloning debate: a web-based survey of scientists and Christian fundamentalist pastors. Weasel LH; Jensen E New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16552907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Communicating science in the COVID-19 news in the UK during Omicron waves: exploring representations of nature of science with epistemic network analysis. Cheung KKC; Chan HY; Erduran S Humanit Soc Sci Commun; 2023; 10(1):282. PubMed ID: 37305352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Occupational practices and the making of health news: a national survey of US Health and medical science journalists. Viswanath K; Blake KD; Meissner HI; Saiontz NG; Mull C; Freeman CS; Hesse B; Croyle RT J Health Commun; 2008 Dec; 13(8):759-77. PubMed ID: 19051112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile phone health risks. Stilgoe J Public Underst Sci; 2007 Jan; 16(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 17575708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of weight-of-evidence strategies on audience perceptions of (un)certainty when media cover contested science. Kohl PA; Kim SY; Peng Y; Akin H; Koh EJ; Howell A; Dunwoody S Public Underst Sci; 2016 Nov; 25(8):976-991. PubMed ID: 26657318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frames of scientific evidence: How journalists represent the (un)certainty of molecular medicine in science television programs. Ruhrmann G; Guenther L; Kessler SH; Milde J Public Underst Sci; 2015 Aug; 24(6):681-96. PubMed ID: 24280532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interaction between academic radiology and the news media: a potentially powerful and unpredictable process--five stories. Donnelly LF; O'Hara SM; Oestreich AE; Rogers LF; Brogdon BG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1382-7. PubMed ID: 19380565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]