These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23832562)

  • 1. Influence in science dialogue: Individual attitude changes as a result of dialogue between laypersons and scientists.
    Zorn TE; Roper J; Weaver CK; Rigby C
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Oct; 21(7):848-64. PubMed ID: 23832562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attributions for extreme weather events: science and the people.
    McClure J; Noy I; Kashima Y; Milfont TL
    Clim Change; 2022; 174(3-4):22. PubMed ID: 36259084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.
    Barnett J; Cooper H; Senior V
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):921-33. PubMed ID: 17958501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective use of critique and dialogue at scholarly conferences.
    DeMarco RF; Horowitz JA; McCurry MK
    Nurs Outlook; 2005; 53(5):232-8. PubMed ID: 16226567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.
    Braun M; Starkbaum J; Dabrock P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145033. PubMed ID: 26660160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards.
    Siegrist M; Keller C; Kastenholz H; Frey S; Wiek A
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 17362400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in the exchange of arguments: the case of scientists' evaluation of lay viewpoints on GM food.
    Cuppen E; Hisschemøller M; Midden C
    Public Underst Sci; 2009 Sep; 18(5):591-606. PubMed ID: 20027774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Language and values in the human cloning debate: a web-based survey of scientists and Christian fundamentalist pastors.
    Weasel LH; Jensen E
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16552907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.
    Besley JC; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Aug; 22(6):644-59. PubMed ID: 23885050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lay self-care in health: the views and perspectives of Israeli laypeople.
    Shye D; Javetz R; Shuval JT
    Soc Sci Med; 1991; 33(3):297-308. PubMed ID: 1925694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gatekeepers of science: attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability.
    McDonald KE; Keys CB; Henry DB
    Am J Ment Retard; 2008 Nov; 113(6):466-78. PubMed ID: 19127657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissemination or participation? Exploring scientists' definitions and science communication goals in the Netherlands.
    Nerghes A; Mulder B; Lee JS
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277677. PubMed ID: 36454886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientists vs laypeople: How genetically modified food is discussed on a Chinese Q&A website.
    Liang J; Liu X; Zhang W
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Nov; 28(8):991-1004. PubMed ID: 31547775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More engagement but less participation: China's alternative approach to public communication of science and technology.
    Jia H
    Public Underst Sci; 2022 Apr; 31(3):331-339. PubMed ID: 35491921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors shaping demand for prostethic dentistry treatment with special focus on implant dentistry.
    Narby B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (218):3-65. PubMed ID: 22338785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laypeople Are Strategic Essentialists, Not Genetic Essentialists.
    Condit CM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 May; 49 Suppl 1():S27-S37. PubMed ID: 31268567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk Prioritization in the Food Domain Using Deliberative and Survey Methods: Differences between Experts and Laypeople.
    Siegrist M; Hübner P; Hartmann C
    Risk Anal; 2018 Mar; 38(3):504-524. PubMed ID: 28675477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laypeople's Collaborative Immersive Virtual Reality Design Discourse in Neighborhood Design.
    Chowdhury S; Schnabel MA
    Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():97. PubMed ID: 33501112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The developmental course of gender differentiation: conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways.
    Liben LS; Bigler RS
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2002; 67(2):i-viii, 1-147; discussion 148-83. PubMed ID: 12465575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.