These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23833174)

  • 1. Factors influencing public risk-benefit considerations of nanotechnology: Assessing the effects of mass media, interpersonal communication, and elaborative processing.
    Ho SS; Scheufele DA; Corley EA
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Jul; 22(5):606-23. PubMed ID: 23833174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology.
    Ho SS; Scheufele DA; Corley EA
    J Nanopart Res; 2010 Oct; 12(8):2703-2715. PubMed ID: 21170125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring risk/benefit perceptions of emerging technologies and their potential impact on communication of public opinion toward science.
    Binder AR; Cacciatore MA; Scheufele DA; Shaw BR; Corley EA
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Oct; 21(7):830-47. PubMed ID: 23832561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Going beyond exposure to local news media: an information-processing examination of public perceptions of food safety.
    Fleming K; Thorson E; Zhang Y
    J Health Commun; 2006 Dec; 11(8):789-806. PubMed ID: 17190783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Another (methodological) look at knowledge gaps and the Internet's potential for closing them.
    Cacciatore MA; Scheufele DA; Corley EA
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 May; 23(4):376-94. PubMed ID: 23825272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cognitive mediation model: factors influencing public knowledge of the H1N1 pandemic and intention to take precautionary behaviors.
    Ho SS; Peh X; Soh VW
    J Health Commun; 2013; 18(7):773-94. PubMed ID: 23402299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A longitudinal study of newspaper and wire service coverage of nanotechnology risks.
    Friedman SM; Egolf BP
    Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1701-17. PubMed ID: 22084862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nanotechnology risk perceptions and communication: emerging technologies, emerging challenges.
    Pidgeon N; Harthorn B; Satterfield T
    Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1694-700. PubMed ID: 22084861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vulnerability and social justice as factors in emergent U.S. nanotechnology risk perceptions.
    Conti J; Satterfield T; Harthorn BH
    Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1734-48. PubMed ID: 21453374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disentangling the influence of value predispositions and risk/benefit perceptions on support for nanotechnology among the American public.
    Kim J; Yeo SK; Brossard D; Scheufele DA; Xenos MA
    Risk Anal; 2014 May; 34(5):965-80. PubMed ID: 24200237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Risks of risk communication - lessons we may learn from media communication].
    Brosius HB
    Gesundheitswesen; 2004 Feb; 66 Suppl 1():S86-91. PubMed ID: 14770344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. News media coverage of trans fat: health risks and policy responses.
    Jarlenski M; Barry CL
    Health Commun; 2013; 28(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 22574857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk and benefit perceptions of mobile phone and base station technology in Bangladesh.
    van Kleef E; Fischer AR; Khan M; Frewer LJ
    Risk Anal; 2010 Jun; 30(6):1002-15. PubMed ID: 20409037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fairness and nanotechnology concern.
    McComas KA; Besley JC
    Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1749-61. PubMed ID: 21883336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opposing ends of the spectrum: Exploring trust in scientific and religious authorities.
    Cacciatore MA; Browning N; Scheufele DA; Brossard D; Xenos MA; Corley EA
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jan; 27(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 27458117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.
    Siegrist M; Stampfli N; Kastenholz H; Keller C
    Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 18406006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore.
    Liang X; Ho SS; Brossard D; Xenos MA; Scheufele DA; Anderson AA; Hao X; He X
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jul; 24(5):582-600. PubMed ID: 24292230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States.
    Scheufele DA; Corley EA; Shih TJ; Dalrymple KE; Ho SS
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2009 Feb; 4(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 19197309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpersonal amplification of risk? Citizen discussions and their impact on perceptions of risks and benefits of a biological research facility.
    Binder AR; Scheufele DA; Brossard D; Gunther AC
    Risk Anal; 2011 Feb; 31(2):324-34. PubMed ID: 21039705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The gap in scientific knowledge and role of science communication in South Korea.
    Chang JH; Kim SH; Kang MH; Shim JC; Ma DH
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jul; 27(5):578-593. PubMed ID: 28073306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.