These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23833175)

  • 1. Causal or spurious? The relationship of knowledge and attitudes to trust in science and technology.
    Roberts MR; Reid G; Schroeder M; Norris SP
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Jul; 22(5):624-41. PubMed ID: 23833175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.
    Barnett J; Cooper H; Senior V
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):921-33. PubMed ID: 17958501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public knowledge and public trust.
    Cunningham-Burley S
    Community Genet; 2006; 9(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16741351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales.
    Calnan M; Montaner D; Horne R
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 May; 60(9):1937-48. PubMed ID: 15743645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The attitudes of religious, environmental, and science policy leaders toward biotechnology.
    Miller JD
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1985 Dec; 8(4):141-64. PubMed ID: 4095277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effects of Epistemic Trust and Social Trust on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: An Empirical Study from China.
    Hu L; Liu R; Zhang W; Zhang T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33096931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support.
    Marques MD; Critchley CR; Walshe J
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jul; 24(5):601-18. PubMed ID: 25063421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cultural authority of science: public trust and acceptance of organized science.
    Gauchat G
    Public Underst Sci; 2011 Nov; 20(6):751-70. PubMed ID: 22397083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of scientific literacy to provide a foundation for designing science communication in Japan.
    Kawamoto S; Nakayama M; Saijo M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Aug; 22(6):674-90. PubMed ID: 23885051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trust in scientific experts on obesity: implications for awareness and behavior change.
    Bleich S; Blendon R; Adams A
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2007 Aug; 15(8):2145-56. PubMed ID: 17712134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cross-cultural study of perceived benefit versus risk as mediators in the trust-acceptance relationship.
    Bronfman NC; Vázquez EL
    Risk Anal; 2011 Dec; 31(12):1919-34. PubMed ID: 21605152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014.
    Achterberg P; de Koster W; van der Waal J
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Aug; 26(6):704-720. PubMed ID: 26644011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy.
    Crall AW; Jordan R; Holfelder K; Newman GJ; Graham J; Waller DM
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Aug; 22(6):745-64. PubMed ID: 23825234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Literacy and its relationship with self-efficacy, trust, and participation in medical decision making.
    DeWalt DA; Boone RS; Pignone MP
    Am J Health Behav; 2007; 31 Suppl 1():S27-35. PubMed ID: 17931133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Denying Darwin: Views on science in the rejection of evolution by Dutch Protestants.
    Hildering P; Consoli L; van den Born R
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):988-98. PubMed ID: 23825235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of a scale to assess attitudes of health care administrators toward the use of e-mail communication between patients and physicians.
    Bhor M; Mason HL
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Dec; 2(4):512-32. PubMed ID: 17161809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public attitudes to the promotion of genomic crop studies in Japan: correlations between genomic literacy, trust, and favourable attitude.
    Ishiyama I; Tanzawa T; Watanabe M; Maeda T; Muto K; Tamakoshi A; Nagai A; Yamagata Z
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 May; 21(4):495-512. PubMed ID: 23038861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Opposing ends of the spectrum: Exploring trust in scientific and religious authorities.
    Cacciatore MA; Browning N; Scheufele DA; Brossard D; Xenos MA; Corley EA
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jan; 27(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 27458117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology.
    Siegrist M
    Risk Anal; 2000 Apr; 20(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 10859780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Major psychological factors affecting acceptance of gene-recombination technology.
    Tanaka Y
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1575-83. PubMed ID: 15660613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.