303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23833319)
21. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.
van Vlijmen OJ; Rangel FA; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Becking AG; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 20640463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.
Neiva MB; Soares ÁC; Lisboa Cde O; Vilella Ode V; Motta AT
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.
Zhao ZM; Zhu Y; Huo R; Su JR; Gao F
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1939-42. PubMed ID: 25329850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.
van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Swennen GR; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 19070753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.
Naji P; Alsufyani NA; Lagravère MO
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):762-72. PubMed ID: 24364751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of inter- and intra-operator cephalometric tracings on cone beam CT radiographs: comparison of the precision of the cone beam CT versus the latero-lateral radiograph tracing.
Farronato G; Salvadori S; Nolet F; Zoia A; Farronato D
Prog Orthod; 2014 Jan; 15():1. PubMed ID: 24393493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.
Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-dimensional cephalometry: a method for the identification and for the orientation of the skull after cone-bean computed tomographic scan.
Frongia G; Bracco P; Piancino MG
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e308-11. PubMed ID: 23715002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.
Sam A; Currie K; Oh H; Flores-Mir C; Lagravére-Vich M
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):317-332. PubMed ID: 30423256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
Hassan B; Nijkamp P; Verheij H; Tairie J; Vink C; van der Stelt P; van Beek H
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21447781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.
Akhare PJ; Dagab AM; Alle RS; Shenoyd U; Garla V
Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 24364195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
Olszewski R; Frison L; Wisniewski M; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The accuracy of a designed software for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks on CBCT images.
Shahidi S; Bahrampour E; Soltanimehr E; Zamani A; Oshagh M; Moattari M; Mehdizadeh A
BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Sep; 14():32. PubMed ID: 25223399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images.
Zamora N; Llamas JM; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):856-64. PubMed ID: 21469969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.
Schlicher W; Nielsen I; Huang JC; Maki K; Hatcher DC; Miller AJ
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 21385857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Cephalometry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Cassetta M; Altieri F; Di Giorgio R; Silvestri A
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):e311-5. PubMed ID: 26080244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
