BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23833319)

  • 41. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
    Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reliability of three-dimensional measurements of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images.
    Chen H; Aarab G; Parsa A; de Lange J; van der Stelt PF; Lobbezoo F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Jul; 122(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 27260280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
    Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reproducibility of maxillofacial landmark identification on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images of patients with mandibular prognathism: Comparative study of a tentative method and traditional cephalometric analysis.
    Fuyamada M; Shibata M; Nawa H; Yoshida K; Kise Y; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):966-73. PubMed ID: 24745629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Liberton DK; Verma P; Contratto A; Lee JS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):e611-e615. PubMed ID: 31478954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.
    Codari M; Caffini M; Tartaglia GM; Sforza C; Baselli G
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 27358080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study.
    Fernandes TM; Adamczyk J; Poleti ML; Henriques JF; Friedland B; Garib DG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25004053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
    Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.
    Farronato G; Garagiola U; Dominici A; Periti G; de Nardi S; Carletti V; Farronato D
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography definition of the anatomical subregions of the upper airway: a validation study.
    Guijarro-Martínez R; Swennen GR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1140-9. PubMed ID: 23623785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reliability of CBCT in the diagnosis of dental asymmetry.
    Ruellas AC; Koerich L; Baratieri C; Mattos CT; Alves M; Brunetto D; Eidson L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 24945519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
    Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reproducibility of three-dimensional coordinate systems based on craniofacial landmarks: a tentative evaluation of four systems created on images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography with a large field of view.
    Shibata M; Nawa H; Kise Y; Fuyamada M; Yoshida K; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):776-84. PubMed ID: 22348241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
    Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Detection of Simulated Vertical Root Fractures: Which Cone-beam Computed Tomographic System Is the Most Accurate?
    Elsaltani MH; Farid MM; Eldin Ashmawy MS
    J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):972-7. PubMed ID: 27130336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ruellas AC; Huanca Ghislanzoni LT; Gomes MR; Danesi C; Lione R; Nguyen T; McNamara JA; Cozza P; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 27021458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cephalometric landmark identification consistency between undergraduate dental students and orthodontic residents in 3-dimensional rendered cone-beam computed tomography images: A preliminary study.
    Míguez-Contreras M; Jiménez-Trujillo I; Romero-Maroto M; López-de-Andrés A; Lagravère MO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28024771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reliability of 3D dental and skeletal landmarks on CBCT images.
    Park J; Baumrind S; Curry S; Carlson SK; Boyd RL; Oh H
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Sep; 89(5):758-767. PubMed ID: 30883187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.