161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23834056)
1. Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory.
Lourenço JS; White K; Maylor EA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1757-64. PubMed ID: 23834056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory.
Loft S; Remington RW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1432-47. PubMed ID: 23281819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is it relevant? Influence of trial manipulations of prospective memory context on task interference.
Lourenço JS; Maylor EA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):687-702. PubMed ID: 23971415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory.
Rummel J; Kuhlmann BG; Touron DR
Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):729-41. PubMed ID: 23703025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The specificity of prospective memory costs.
Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Hirschhorn E; Sobin Y; Gollwitzer PM
Memory; 2012; 20(8):848-64. PubMed ID: 22900905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prior task experience and comparable stimulus exposure nullify focal and nonfocal prospective memory retrieval differences.
Hicks JL; Franks BA; Spitler SN
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 27461749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acute stress shifts the balance between controlled and automatic processes in prospective memory.
Möschl M; Walser M; Plessow F; Goschke T; Fischer R
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Oct; 144():53-67. PubMed ID: 28625494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accumulating evidence about what prospective memory costs actually reveal.
Strickland L; Heathcote A; Remington RW; Loft S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1616-1629. PubMed ID: 28383957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Allowing brief delays in responding improves event-based prospective memory for young adults living with HIV disease.
Loft S; Doyle KL; Naar-King S; Outlaw AY; Nichols SL; Weber E; Casaletto KB; Woods SP
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(7):761-72. PubMed ID: 25116075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ERP correlates of target checking are dependent upon the defining features of the prospective memory cues.
Scolaro A; West R; Cohen AL
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Sep; 93(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 24952215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling criterion shifts and target checking in prospective memory monitoring.
Horn SS; Bayen UJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):95-117. PubMed ID: 25151245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.
Hunter Ball B; Bugg JM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1405-1415. PubMed ID: 29435962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.
Bugg JM; Ball BH
Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):755-775. PubMed ID: 28275948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.
Ball BH; Bugg JM
Psychol Aging; 2018 May; 33(3):527-544. PubMed ID: 29756806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of focal and nonfocal cues on the neural correlates of prospective memory: insights from ERPs.
Cona G; Bisiacchi PS; Moscovitch M
Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2630-46. PubMed ID: 23645716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?
Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT; Lee JH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):736-49. PubMed ID: 20438269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internalizing versus externalizing control: different ways to perform a time-based prospective memory task.
Huang T; Loft S; Humphreys MS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1064-71. PubMed ID: 24548325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Event-based prospective memory failure in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.
Costa A; Perri R; Zabberoni S; Barban F; Caltagirone C; Carlesimo GA
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(8):2209-16. PubMed ID: 21419790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of context expectation on prospective memory performance among older and younger adults.
Kominsky TK; Reese-Melancon C
Memory; 2017 Jan; 25(1):122-131. PubMed ID: 27905253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrieval in prospective memory: Multiple processes or just delay?
Anderson FT; McDaniel MA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2197-2207. PubMed ID: 30957661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
