276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23834377)
1. Satisfaction and complications with the Titan® one-touch release penile implant.
Lindeborg L; Fode M; Fahrenkrug L; Sønksen J
Scand J Urol; 2014 Feb; 48(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 23834377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective evaluation of patient satisfaction, and surgeon and patient trainer assessment of the Coloplast titan one touch release three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis.
Ohl DA; Brock G; Ralph D; Bogache W; Jones L; Munarriz R; Levine L; Ritenour C
J Sex Med; 2012 Sep; 9(9):2467-74. PubMed ID: 22759540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Inflatable penile prosthesis: satisfaction rate, result, prognostic factors. Prospective study on 50 primooperated patients in CHU of Nice between 2000 and 2009].
Obadia F; Mouracade P; Terrier JE; Amiel J; Gigante M; Li G; Chevallier D
Prog Urol; 2013 Dec; 23(16):1419-27. PubMed ID: 24274947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long term patient satisfaction and quality of life with AMS700CX inflatable penile prosthesis.
Vitarelli A; Divenuto L; Fortunato F; Falco A; Pagliarulo V; Antonini G; Gentile V; Sciarra A; Salciccia S; Sansalone S; Di Placido MR; Garaffa G; Pagliarulo A
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2013 Sep; 85(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 24085235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile implants].
Tønseth KA; Schultz A; Talseth T; Hedlund H
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Jun; 125(13):1825-7. PubMed ID: 16012552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term patient-reported satisfaction with different inflatable penile prosthesis: Comparison between AMS 700CX and Coloplast Titan.
Morgado A; Cavadas AS; Pacheco Figueiredo L; Tomada N
Rev Int Androl; 2018; 16(3):112-118. PubMed ID: 30300132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concomitant ventral phalloplasty during penile implant surgery: a novel procedure that optimizes patient satisfaction and their perception of phallic length after penile implant surgery.
Miranda-Sousa A; Keating M; Moreira S; Baker M; Carrion R
J Sex Med; 2007 Sep; 4(5):1494-9. PubMed ID: 17727355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples' Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation.
Çayan S; Aşcı R; Efesoy O; Bolat MS; Akbay E; Yaman Ö
J Sex Med; 2019 Jul; 16(7):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 31155387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany.
Natali A; Olianas R; Fisch M
J Sex Med; 2008 Jun; 5(6):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18410306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective evaluation of postoperative penile rehabilitation: penile length/girth maintenance 1 year following Coloplast Titan inflatable penile prosthesis.
Henry GD; Carrion R; Jennermann C; Wang R
J Sex Med; 2015 May; 12(5):1298-304. PubMed ID: 25872574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: evaluation of efficacy, satisfaction profile and complications.
Antonini G; Busetto GM; De Berardinis E; Giovannone R; Vicini P; Del Giudice F; Conti SL; Gentile V; Perito PE
Int J Impot Res; 2016; 28(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 26657316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Serial assessment of efficacy and satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery.
Mulhall JP; Ahmed A; Branch J; Parker M
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1429-33. PubMed ID: 12629377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study.
Levine LA; Estrada CR; Morgentaler A
J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 11490249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pseudo-malfunction of the Coloplast Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis One-Touch Release Pump.
Garber BB; Khurgin JL; Stember DS; Perito PE
Urology; 2014 Oct; 84(4):857-9. PubMed ID: 25260446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis.
Lux M; Reyes-Vallejo L; Morgentaler A; Levine LA
J Urol; 2007 Jan; 177(1):262-6. PubMed ID: 17162061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient's satisfaction after 2-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: An Italian multicentric study.
Gentile G; Franceschelli A; Massenio P; Tuccio A; Cocci A; Divenuto L; Romagnoli D; Natali A; Vitarelli A; Cormio L; Colombo F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2016 Mar; 88(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 27072167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses.
Otero JR; Cruz CR; Gómez BG; Geli JS; Polo JM; Castañé ER; Antolín AR
Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(3):321-325. PubMed ID: 26806085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution.
Bozkurt IH; Arslan B; Yonguc T; Kozacıoglu Z; Degirmenci T; Gunlusoy B; Minareci S
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 26200547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-submuscular vs. space of Retzius reservoir placement during implantation of inflatable penile implants.
Osmonov D; Chomicz A; Tropmann-Frick M; Arndt KM; Jünemann KP
Int J Impot Res; 2020 Jan; 32(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 31562495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [100 cases of three-piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis with new scrotal pump: Evaluation of 3 specialised centres].
Garrido-Abad P; Rosselló-Barbará M; Sabino-Galdona J; Fernández-Arjona M; Rosselló-Gayá M
Arch Esp Urol; 2015 May; 68(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 26033761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
