BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

31 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23834485)

  • 1. Personalisation of breast cancer follow-up: a time-dependent prognostic nomogram for the estimation of annual risk of locoregional recurrence in early breast cancer patients.
    Witteveen A; Vliegen IM; Sonke GS; Klaase JM; IJzerman MJ; Siesling S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Aug; 152(3):627-36. PubMed ID: 26162567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opportunities for personalised follow-up in breast cancer: the gap between daily practice and recurrence risk.
    Voets MM; Hassink NS; Veltman J; Slump CH; Koffijberg H; Siesling S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jun; 205(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 38409613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Personalized surveillance and aftercare for non-metastasized breast cancer: the NABOR study protocol of a multiple interrupted time series design.
    Klaassen-Dekker A; Drossaert CHC; Van Maaren MC; Van Leeuwen-Stok AE; Retel VP; Korevaar JC; Siesling S;
    BMC Cancer; 2023 Nov; 23(1):1112. PubMed ID: 37964214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of the Breast Cancer Survivors Symptom Checklist for Use in Follow-Up Multidisciplinary Appointments.
    Schou-Bredal I; Sørensen EM; Kraglund KH; Jensen VS; Drageset S
    Patient Relat Outcome Meas; 2022; 13():199-208. PubMed ID: 36238534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Follow-up after breast cancer: Variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals.
    Ankersmid JW; van Hoeve JC; Strobbe LJA; van Riet YEA; van Uden-Kraan CF; Siesling S; Drossaert CHC;
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2021 Nov; 30(6):e13505. PubMed ID: 34449103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy as a Cancer Screening and Diagnostic Tool: A Review and Prospects.
    Su KY; Lee WL
    Cancers (Basel); 2020 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Barriers to implementation of stratified care in primary biliary cholangitis: a scoping exercise.
    Corrigan M; Hirschfield G; Greenfield S; Parry J
    BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2019; 6(1):e000226. PubMed ID: 31321066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opportunities for personalised follow-up care among patients with breast cancer: A scoping review to identify preference-sensitive decisions.
    de Ligt KM; van Egdom LSE; Koppert LB; Siesling S; van Til JA
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 May; 28(3):e13092. PubMed ID: 31074162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences.
    Klaassen L; Dirksen C; Boersma L; Hoving C;
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2018 Mar; 27(2):e12730. PubMed ID: 28727259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. French women's representations and experiences of the post-treatment management of breast cancer and their perception of the general practitioner's role in follow-up care: A qualitative study.
    Laporte C; Vaure J; Bottet A; Eschalier B; Raineau C; Pezet D; Vorilhon P
    Health Expect; 2017 Aug; 20(4):788-796. PubMed ID: 27899006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Follow-up Reality for Breast Cancer Patients - Standardised Survey of Patients and Physicians and Analysis of Treatment Data.
    Feiten S; Dünnebacke J; Friesenhahn V; Heymanns J; Köppler H; Meister R; Thomalla J; van Roye C; Wey D; Weide R
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2016 May; 76(5):557-563. PubMed ID: 27239065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Follow-up care for breast cancer survivors: improving patient outcomes.
    Chopra I; Chopra A
    Patient Relat Outcome Meas; 2014; 5():71-85. PubMed ID: 25210481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast cancer follow-up: from the perspective of health professionals and patients.
    Kwast AB; Drossaert CH; Siesling S;
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2013 Nov; 22(6):754-64. PubMed ID: 23834485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients' needs and preferences in routine follow-up for early breast cancer; an evaluation of the changing role of the nurse practitioner.
    van Hezewijk M; Ranke GM; van Nes JG; Stiggelbout AM; de Bock GH; van de Velde CJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 37(9):765-73. PubMed ID: 21764242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuity of care for women with breast cancer: a survey of the views and experiences of patients, carers and health care professionals.
    Lafferty J; Rankin F; Duffy C; Kearney P; Doherty E; McMenamin M; Coates V
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Dec; 15(5):419-27. PubMed ID: 21112249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: one strategy fits all? An investigation of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment.
    Kimman ML; Dellaert BG; Boersma LJ; Lambin P; Dirksen CD
    Acta Oncol; 2010 Apr; 49(3):328-37. PubMed ID: 20148645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer.
    CMAJ; 1998 Feb; 158 Suppl 3():S65-70. PubMed ID: 9484280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review of long-term follow-up for survivors of childhood cancer.
    Aslett H; Levitt G; Richardson A; Gibson F
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Aug; 43(12):1781-90. PubMed ID: 17543515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.