240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23834536)
1. Uterine incision-to-delivery interval and perinatal outcomes in transverse versus vertical incisions in preterm cesarean deliveries.
Luthra G; Gawade P; Starikov R; Markenson G
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Dec; 26(18):1788-91. PubMed ID: 23834536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative safety of the low transverse versus the low vertical uterine incision for cesarean delivery of breech infants.
Schutterman EB; Grimes DA
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 May; 61(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 6835613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transverse versus longitudinal uterine incision in cesarean delivery of triplets.
Mordel N; Ezra Y; Benshushan A; Dorembus D; Schenker JG; Sadovsky E
J Reprod Med; 1993 Sep; 38(9):695-6. PubMed ID: 8254591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal outcomes according to cesarean uterine incision between 23 and 27 weeks' gestation.
Kawakita T; Dhillon NK; Huang JCC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jul; 34(14):2290-2294. PubMed ID: 31480918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Fetal outcome following cesarean section in premature labor. Isthmocorpus longitudinal section or isthmian transverse section?].
Dietl J; Dannecker G; Goretzki K; Hirsch HA
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Jan; 48(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 3350321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends, risk factors and pregnancy outcome in women with uterine rupture.
Ronel D; Wiznitzer A; Sergienko R; Zlotnik A; Sheiner E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 21735183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. T and J vertical extensions in low transverse cesarean births.
Boyle JG; Gabbe SG
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 8559531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of cesarean section on intermediate and late preterm births: United States, 2000-2003.
Malloy MH
Birth; 2009 Mar; 36(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19278380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in transverse and vertical skin incision for placenta previa : Skin incision for placenta previa.
Fan D; Zhang H; Rao J; Lin D; Wu S; Li P; Chen G; Zhou Z; Liu J; Chen T; Chen F; Guo X; Liu Z
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jun; 21(1):441. PubMed ID: 34167519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion in cesarean deliveries for Japanese twins: comparison with those for singletons.
Suzuki S; Hiraizumi Y; Miyake H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 22810621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The association of skin-incision type at cesarean with maternal and neonatal morbidity for women with multiple prior cesarean deliveries.
Palatnik A; Grobman WA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():121-4. PubMed ID: 26117440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perinatal outcome of preterm cesarean section in a resource-limited centre: a comparison between general anaesthesia and subarachnoid block.
Nwafor MI; Aniebue UU; Nwankwo TO; Onyeka TC; Okafor VU
Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 25244273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uterine incision and maternal morbidity after cesarean section for delivery of the very low birthweight fetus.
Druzin ML; Hutson JM; San Roman G
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Aug; 169(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 2756460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of transverse and vertical skin incision for emergency cesarean delivery.
Wylie BJ; Gilbert S; Landon MB; Spong CY; Rouse DJ; Leveno KJ; Varner MW; Caritis SN; Meis PJ; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O;
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 115(6):1134-1140. PubMed ID: 20502282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among breech births.
Demirci O; Tuğrul AS; Turgut A; Ceylan S; Eren S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 21735191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal Incision Selection for Cesarean Delivery of Women with Class III Obesity.
Sutton AL; Sanders LB; Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Edwards RK
Am J Perinatol; 2016 May; 33(6):547-51. PubMed ID: 26692204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transverse fundal uterine incision for delivery of extremely low birth-weight infants.
Taga A; Kondoh E; Hamanishi J; Kawasaki K; Fujita K; Mogami H; Konishi I
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Aug; 27(12):1285-7. PubMed ID: 24111613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relationship between Rostral Retraction of the Pannus and Outcomes at Cesarean Section.
Turan OM; Rosenbloom J; Galey JL; Kahntroff SL; Bharadwaj S; Turner SM; Malinow AM
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Aug; 33(10):951-6. PubMed ID: 27100522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maternal and perinatal morbidity associated with classic and inverted T cesarean incisions.
Patterson LS; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 100(4):633-7. PubMed ID: 12383525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
