204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23834724)
21. In vivo evaluation of cp Ti implants with modified surfaces by laser beam with and without hydroxyapatite chemical deposition and without and with thermal treatment: topographic characterization and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
Queiroz TP; de Molon RS; Souza FÁ; Margonar R; Thomazini AH; Guastaldi AC; Hochuli-Vieira E
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 27530186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of Micro Threads Alteration on Osseointegration and Primary Stability of Implants: An FEA and In Vivo Analysis in Rabbits.
Chowdhary R; Halldin A; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 24034600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Histomorphometric analysis and removal torque of small diameter implants with alternative surface treatments and different designs.
Ahn SJ; Leesungbok R; Lee SW
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(4):263-72. PubMed ID: 20735263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of osseointegration between laser-etched and magnesium-incorporated oxidized implants in the rabbit femur.
Kang SH; Cho JH; Park SH; Toothaker R; Cho SA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 23748308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants coated with fibroblast growth factor-fibronectin (FGF-FN) fusion protein.
Park JM; Koak JY; Jang JH; Han CH; Kim SK; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):859-66. PubMed ID: 17190295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Control Variable Implants Improve Interpretation of Surface Modification and Implant Design Effects on Early Bone Responses: An In Vivo Study.
Choi JY; Kang SH; Kim HY; Yeo IL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1033-1040. PubMed ID: 30231089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits.
Chacon GE; Stine EA; Larsen PE; Beck FM; McGlumphy EA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16781331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of peri-implant bone formation around injection-molded and machined surface zirconia implants in rabbit tibiae.
Kim HK; Woo KM; Shon WJ; Ahn JS; Cha S; Park YS
Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(4):508-15. PubMed ID: 26235717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of steroid-induced osteoporosis on osseointegration of titanium implants.
Fujimoto T; Niimi A; Sawai T; Ueda M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 9581403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomedical Ti-Mo alloys with surface machined and modified by laser beam: biomechanical, histological, and histometric analysis in rabbits.
Oliveira NT; Guastaldi FP; Perrotti V; Hochuli-Vieira E; Guastaldi AC; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 21554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of diabetes mellitus and metabolic control on bone healing around osseointegrated implants: removal torque and histomorphometric analysis in rats.
de Molon RS; Morais-Camilo JA; Verzola MH; Faeda RS; Pepato MT; Marcantonio E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):831-7. PubMed ID: 22509797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Buser D; Nydegger T; Hirt HP; Cochran DL; Nolte LP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Osseointegration evaluation of laser-deposited titanium dioxide nanoparticles on commercially pure titanium dental implants.
Azzawi ZGM; Hamad TI; Kadhim SA; Naji GA
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Jun; 29(7):96. PubMed ID: 29946975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits.
Steigenga J; Al-Shammari K; Misch C; Nociti FH; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1233-41. PubMed ID: 15515339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Histologic evaluation of human bone integration on machined and sandblasted acid-etched titanium surfaces in type IV bone.
Grassi S; Piattelli A; Ferrari DS; Figueiredo LC; Feres M; Iezzi G; Shibli JA
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 17410906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats.
Marinho VC; Celletti R; Bracchetti G; Petrone G; Minkin C; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12608672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of implant surface topography on bone-regenerative potential and mechanical retention in the human maxilla and mandible.
Wei N; Bin S; Jing Z; Wei S; Yingqiong Z
Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 25208367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The osseointegration behavior of titanium-zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits.
Wen B; Zhu F; Li Z; Zhang P; Lin X; Dard M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. PubMed ID: 23432001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model.
Ernst S; Stübinger S; Schüpbach P; Sidler M; Klein K; Ferguson SJ; von Rechenberg B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):898-908. PubMed ID: 24954017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
