BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23835230)

  • 1. EU marketing authorization review of orphan and non-orphan drugs does not differ.
    Putzeist M; Mantel-Teeuwisse AK; Llinares J; Gispen-De Wied CC; Hoes AW; Leufkens HG
    Drug Discov Today; 2013 Oct; 18(19-20):1001-6. PubMed ID: 23835230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The possibility of obtaining marketing authorization of orphan pharmaceutical compounding preparations: 3,4-DAP for Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome.
    de Wilde S; de Jong MGH; Lipka AF; Guchelaar HJ; Schimmel KJM
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2018 Mar; 114():24-29. PubMed ID: 29191521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orphan drug development across Europe: bottlenecks and opportunities.
    Heemstra HE; de Vrueh RL; van Weely S; Büller HA; Leufkens HG
    Drug Discov Today; 2008 Aug; 13(15-16):670-6. PubMed ID: 18583178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulatory watch: Where do new medicines originate from in the EU?
    Lincker H; Ziogas C; Carr M; Porta N; Eichler HG
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2014 Feb; 13(2):92-3. PubMed ID: 24481298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approval probabilities and regulatory review patterns for anticancer drugs in the European Union.
    Hartmann M; Mayer-Nicolai C; Pfaff O
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2013 Aug; 87(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 23433721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the conditional marketing authorization pathway for oncology medicines in Europe.
    Hoekman J; Boon WP; Bouvy JC; Ebbers HC; de Jong JP; De Bruin ML
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2015 Nov; 98(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 26080745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Orphan drugs--medications for patients with rare diseases].
    Thielke D; Thyssen JP; Hansen BJ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Jun; 168(23):2236-8. PubMed ID: 16768975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D.
    Meekings KN; Williams CS; Arrowsmith JE
    Drug Discov Today; 2012 Jul; 17(13-14):660-4. PubMed ID: 22366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cancer: Is it really so different? Particularities of oncologic drugs from the perspective of the pharmaceutical regulatory agency].
    Enzmann H; Broich K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 23663906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010 - 2020.
    Schey C; Milanova T; Hutchings A
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2011 Sep; 6():62. PubMed ID: 21951518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orphan drugs, orphan diseases. The first decade of orphan drug legislation in the EU.
    Joppi R; Bertele' V; Garattini S
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Apr; 69(4):1009-24. PubMed ID: 23090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review and comparison of clinical evidence submitted to support European Medicines Agency market authorization of orphan-designated oncological treatments.
    Winstone J; Chadda S; Ralston S; Sajosi P
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2015 Oct; 10():139. PubMed ID: 26511061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ODs with a positive TPR conclusion, not subject to a conditional approval, and approved without requering a pass would be more likely to be reimbursed in Spain.
    Poveda JL; Gómez C; Gil A; Badia X
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2023 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 36609401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [European incentives for orphan medicinal products].
    Enzmann H; Lütz J
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2008 May; 51(5):500-8. PubMed ID: 18696141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Registering medicines for low-income countries: how suitable are the stringent review procedures of the World Health Organisation, the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency?
    Doua JY; Van Geertruyden JP
    Trop Med Int Health; 2014 Jan; 19(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 24134396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Authorization and reimbursement of orphan drugs in an international comparison].
    Roll K; Stargardt T; Schreyögg J
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Aug; 73(8-9):504-14. PubMed ID: 20848380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critical assessment of belgian reimbursement dossiers of orphan drugs.
    Denis A; Mergaert L; Fostier C; Cleemput I; Hulstaert F; Simoens S
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Oct; 29(10):883-93. PubMed ID: 21905759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration in Granting Accelerated Marketing Authorizations for Covid-19 Medicines and their Utilized Regulations.
    Ghadanian M; Schafheutle E
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2024 Jan; 58(1):79-113. PubMed ID: 37861859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative analysis to guide orphan drug development.
    Lesko LJ
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Aug; 92(2):258-61. PubMed ID: 22739138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drugs for rare diseases: mixed assessment in Europe.
    Prescrire Int; 2007 Feb; 16(87):36-42. PubMed ID: 17323539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.