BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23835372)

  • 1. Accurate determination of CT point-spread-function with high precision.
    Kayugawa A; Ohkubo M; Wada S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):3905. PubMed ID: 23835372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography.
    Nakaya Y; Kawata Y; Niki N; Umetatni K; Ohmatsu H; Moriyama N
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4347-64. PubMed ID: 22830768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images.
    Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Budi WS; Haryanto F; Dougherty G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):244-252. PubMed ID: 30338920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Isotope independent determination of PET/CT modulation transfer functions from phantom measurements on spheres.
    Prenosil GA; Klaeser B; Hentschel M; Fürstner M; Berndt M; Krause T; Weitzel T
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5767. PubMed ID: 27782715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography.
    Ohkubo M; Wada S; Matsumoto T; Nishizawa K
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2757-64. PubMed ID: 16964851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pitfall of using the circular-edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images.
    Narita A; Ohkubo M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 31957969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image filtering as an alternative to the application of a different reconstruction kernel in CT imaging: feasibility study in lung cancer screening.
    Ohkubo M; Wada S; Kayugawa A; Matsumoto T; Murao K
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):3915-23. PubMed ID: 21858988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems.
    Marshall NW; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7629-50. PubMed ID: 23123601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the spatial resolution of multiplanar reconstruction images.
    Kudomi S; Ueda K; Ueda Y; Kawakubo M; Sanada T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jul; 1(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 20821152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation for Resolution Property of CT Image with Half-reconstruction Algorithm].
    Tsuda N; Mitsui K; Oda S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(8):736-746. PubMed ID: 31434845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Accuracy of Modulation Transfer Function for Target Size and Field of View in a Circular Edge Strategy Using the CT Image Measurement Program].
    Fukunaga M; Onishi H; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Jun; 72(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 27320152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deriving the modulation transfer function of CT from extremely noisy edge profiles.
    Mori I; Machida Y
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2009 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 20821125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-speed slot-scanning radiography using small-angle tomosynthesis: Investigation of spatial resolution.
    Luckner C; Herbst M; Weber T; Beister M; Ritschl L; Kappler S; Maier A
    Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5454-5466. PubMed ID: 31529513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation transfer function evaluation of cone beam computed tomography for dental use with the oversampling method.
    Watanabe H; Honda E; Kurabayashi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jan; 39(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 20089741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical Note: Accuracy of MTF measurements with an edge phantom at megavoltage x-ray energies.
    Loot K; Block A
    Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5685-5689. PubMed ID: 31580489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of ROI Size on the Accuracy of Noise Measurement in CT on Computational and ACR Phantoms.
    Anam C; Triadyaksa P; Naufal A; Arifin Z; Muhlisin Z; Setiawati E; Budi WS
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2022 Aug; 12(4):359-368. PubMed ID: 36059282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.