BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23835384)

  • 1. Evaluation of hybrid inverse planning and optimization (HIPO) algorithm for optimization in real-time, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate.
    Pokharel S; Rana S; Blikenstaff J; Sadeghi A; Prestidge B
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4198. PubMed ID: 23835384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
    Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L
    Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
    Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
    Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
    Sachpazidis I; Hense J; Mavroidis P; Gainey M; Baltas D
    Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2955-2968. PubMed ID: 31055834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
    Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors].
    Ling B; Chen L; Zhang J; Cao X; Ye W; Ouyang Y; Chi F; Ding Z
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2024 Apr; 44(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 38708512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Hybrid Inverse Planning and Optimization for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy.
    Matias Ldos S; Palmqvist T; Wolke J; Nilsson J; Beskow C; Maphossa AM; Toma-Dasu I
    Anticancer Res; 2015 Nov; 35(11):6091-6. PubMed ID: 26504034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
    Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
    Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
    Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the IPSA and HIPO algorithms for interstitial tongue high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
    Choi CH; Park SY; Park JM; Wu HG; Kim JH; Kim JI
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205229. PubMed ID: 30286187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose optimization comparison study of inverse planning simulated annealing [IPSA] and hybrid inverse planning optimization [HIPO] in interstitial brachytherapy of head and neck cancer.
    Kumar Barik B; Sarang Dhar S; Singh R; Mandal A; Mohan Aggarwal L; Pratap Shahi U; Choudhary S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):417-421. PubMed ID: 34088645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
    Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.
    Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
    Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
    Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New inverse planning technology for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: description and evaluation within a clinical frame.
    Trnková P; Pötter R; Baltas D; Karabis A; Fidarova E; Dimopoulos J; Georg D; Kirisits C
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 19846230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate.
    Lachance B; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Lessard E; Chrétien M; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L; Vigneault E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 12182978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fast inverse treatment planning strategy facilitating optimized catheter selection in image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy.
    Guthier CV; Damato AL; Hesser JW; Viswanathan AN; Cormack RA
    Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6117-6127. PubMed ID: 28921538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A gEUD-based inverse planning technique for HDR prostate brachytherapy: feasibility study.
    Giantsoudi D; Baltas D; Karabis A; Mavroidis P; Zamboglou N; Tselis N; Shi C; Papanikolaou N
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041704. PubMed ID: 23556874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection.
    Frank CH; Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Ruan D; Park SJ; Chang AJ; Venkat PS; Kishan AU; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6525-6534. PubMed ID: 37650773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of clinical benefits achievable by using different optimization algorithms during real-time prostate brachytherapy.
    Adamczyk M; Zwierzchowski G; Malicki J; Skowronek J
    Phys Med; 2013 Jan; 29(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 22221470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.