188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23835384)
41. Demonstration of simulated annealing optimization for permanent breast seed implant treatment planning.
Roumeliotis M; Yates B; Watt E; Frederick A; Meyer T
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(3):615-620. PubMed ID: 29396035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent.
Yao R; Templeton AK; Liao Y; Turian JV; Kiel KD; Chu JC
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 24359671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent-seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths.
Cunha JA; Pickett B; Pouliot J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 11(3):3096. PubMed ID: 20717078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Development of patient and catheter specific error thresholds for high dose rate prostate brachytherapy.
Koprivec D; Belanger C; Beaulieu L; Chatigny PY; Rosenfeld A; Cutajar D; Petasecca M; Howie A; Bucci J; Poder J
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2144-2154. PubMed ID: 38308854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy dose distributions with iridium-192, ytterbium-169, and thulium-170 sources.
Krishnamurthy D; Weinberg V; Cunha JA; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 21397569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Use of three-dimensional radiation therapy planning tools and intraoperative ultrasound to evaluate high dose rate prostate brachytherapy implants.
Kini VR; Edmundson GK; Vicini FA; Jaffray DA; Gustafson G; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Feb; 43(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 10078639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy: a dosimetric comparison of hemigland vs. conventional whole-gland treatment.
Kamrava M; Chung MP; Kayode O; Wang J; Marks L; Kupelian P; Steinberg M; Park SJ; Demanes DJ
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 23406987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Automated treatment planning engine for prostate seed implant brachytherapy.
Yu Y; Zhang JB; Brasacchio RA; Okunieff PG; Rubens DJ; Strang JG; Soni A; Messing EM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Feb; 43(3):647-52. PubMed ID: 10078652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Analysis of interaction between number of implant catheters and dose-volume histograms in prostate high- dose-rate brachytherapy using a computer model.
Charra-Brunaud C; Hsu IC; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 12738336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization.
Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A multi-criteria optimization approach for HDR prostate brachytherapy: I. Pareto surface approximation.
Cui S; Després P; Beaulieu L
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(20):205004. PubMed ID: 30226472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Dosimetric equivalence of nonstandard HDR brachytherapy catheter patterns.
Cunha JA; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):233-9. PubMed ID: 19235391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Novel tools for stepping source brachytherapy treatment planning: enhanced geometrical optimization and interactive inverse planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Koedooder K; Petra Kok H; van Wieringen N; Pieters BR; Bel A
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):348-53. PubMed ID: 25563274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Impact of prostate catheter displacement in inverse planning--simulated annealing and geometric optimization.
Reynés-Llompart G; Pino F; Modolell I; Gullón C; Pera J; Gutierrez C; Picón C
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 26612698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intraoperative dynamic dose optimization in permanent prostate implants.
Lee EK; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jul; 56(3):854-61. PubMed ID: 12788195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Inverse planning for HDR prostate brachytherapy used to boost dominant intraprostatic lesions defined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging.
Pouliot J; Kim Y; Lessard E; Hsu IC; Vigneron DB; Kurhanewicz J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(4):1196-207. PubMed ID: 15234056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Applying the column generation method to the intensity modulated high dose rate brachytherapy inverse planning problem.
Antaki M; Renaud MA; Morcos M; Seuntjens J; Enger SA
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(6):. PubMed ID: 36791469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. 3D inverse treatment planning for the tandem and ovoid applicator in cervical cancer.
Dewitt KD; Hsu IC; Speight J; Weinberg VK; Lessard E; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1270-4. PubMed ID: 16253782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A dose-volume histogram based optimization algorithm for ultrasound guided prostate implants.
Chen Y; Boyer AL; Xing L
Med Phys; 2000 Oct; 27(10):2286-92. PubMed ID: 11099195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
