These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23835617)

  • 1. Remindings influence the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli.
    Tullis JG; Braverman M; Ross BH; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 23835617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The reminding effect: presentation of associates enhances memory for related words in a list.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1526-40. PubMed ID: 24635185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs.
    Twilley LC; Dixon P; Taylor D; Clark K
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Jan; 22(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 8035680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric asymmetries in meaning selection: evidence from the disambiguation of homophonic vs. heterophonic homographs.
    Peleg O; Markus A; Eviatar Z
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Dec; 80(3):328-37. PubMed ID: 23043870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the importance of looking back: the role of recursive remindings in recency judgments and cued recall.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jul; 41(5):625-37. PubMed ID: 23371792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biasing thematic contexts for ambiguous sentences in a dichotic listening experiment.
    Hoppe RA; Kess JF
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1986 May; 15(3):225-41. PubMed ID: 3723442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic asymmetries are modulated by phonological asymmetries: evidence from the disambiguation of homophonic versus heterophonic homographs.
    Peleg O; Eviatar Z
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Jun; 70(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 19249146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of "effort after meaning" on recall: differences in within- and between-subjects designs.
    Zaromb FM; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):447-63. PubMed ID: 19460952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretive cues and ambiguity in generalized anxiety disorder.
    Hazlett-Stevens H; Borkovec TD
    Behav Res Ther; 2004 Aug; 42(8):881-92. PubMed ID: 15178464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric sensitivities to lexical and contextual information: evidence from lexical ambiguity resolution.
    Peleg O; Eviatar Z
    Brain Lang; 2008 May; 105(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 17976714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two routes to memory benefits of guessing.
    Zawadzka K; Hanczakowski M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1748-1760. PubMed ID: 30570326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
    Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words.
    Rayner K; Frazier L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 2528602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing novel compounds: evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns.
    Coolen R; van Jaarsveld HJ; Schreuder R
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Mar; 21(2):235-46. PubMed ID: 8469132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making remembering more memorable.
    Leppanen ML; Lyle KB
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):960-973. PubMed ID: 29291672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Encoding effects of remindings.
    Ross BH; Bradshaw GL
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):591-605. PubMed ID: 7968555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specificity of word meaning and use of sentence context by hearing-impaired adults.
    Stinson M; Tracy OA
    J Commun Disord; 1983 May; 16(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 6875032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.