These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy. Nakata K; Nagai E; Ohuchida K; Nakamura K; Tanaka M World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1099-104. PubMed ID: 25582767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil. Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oblique conformal anastomosis decreased the risks of cervical anastomotic leakage after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. Guo J; Xu Y; Huang C; Wang M; Zhang F; Liu Z; Li Z; Lv H; Tian Z Asian J Surg; 2024 Aug; 47(8):3478-3484. PubMed ID: 38604851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes. Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study. Liu YJ; Fan J; He HH; Zhu SS; Chen QL; Cao RH BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021025. PubMed ID: 30181184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies. Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]