These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23837162)

  • 21. Hard tissue response to argon plasma cleaning/sterilisation of customised titanium abutments versus 5-second steam cleaning: results of a 2-year post-loading follow-up from an explanatory randomised controlled trial in periodontally healthy patients.
    Canullo L; Penarrocha D; Micarelli C; Massidda O; Bazzoli M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 24179979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
    Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bacterial leakage in implants with different implant-abutment connections: an in vitro study.
    Assenza B; Tripodi D; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; D'Ercole S
    J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 21780904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload.
    Park JK; Choi JU; Jeon YC; Choi KS; Jeong CM
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 20456024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of abutment screw preload on stress distribution in marginal bone.
    Khraisat A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 22442768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of clockwise and counterclockwise twisting moments on abutment screw loosening.
    Yao KT; Kao HC; Cheng CK; Fang HW; Yip SW; Hsu ML
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1181-6. PubMed ID: 22092296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
    Kim KS; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB; Yang JH; Lee JB; Yim SH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21198900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
    Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30.
    Asli HN; Saberi BV; Fatemi AS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(3):314-319. PubMed ID: 28721998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification.
    Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reverse Torque Values of Abutment Screws After Dynamic Loading: Effects of Sealant Agents and the Taper of Conical Connections.
    Ozdiler A; Dayan SC; Gencel B; Ozkol GI
    J Oral Implantol; 2021 Aug; 47(4):287-293. PubMed ID: 32870274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do Sealing Materials Influence Superstructure Attachment in Implants?
    Biscoping S; Ruttmann E; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):163-165. PubMed ID: 29518811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
    Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Critical bending moment of four implant-abutment interface designs.
    Lee FK; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):744-51. PubMed ID: 20657869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
    Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro sealing ability of two materials at five different implant-abutment surfaces.
    Duarte AR; Rossetti PH; Rossetti LM; Torres SA; Bonachela WC
    J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1828-32. PubMed ID: 17076607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Load fatigue performance of two implant-abutment combinations.
    Basten CH; Nicholls JI; Daly CH; Taggart R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 8803348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.