These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23837265)

  • 1. Mental illness on appeal and the right to assist counsel.
    Hennell J
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2013; 29(2):350-78. PubMed ID: 23837265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. And some grow mad, and all grow bad: prisoners' constitutional right to receive psychiatric treatment.
    Jennings EM
    N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1985; 11(1):160-85. PubMed ID: 16100811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developments in the law: the law of mental illness.
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Feb; 121(4):1114-91. PubMed ID: 18354871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
    Cantor JD
    Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
    Quinlan M
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fourteenth amendment--the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs masked by prison bars.
    Sindel PE
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1991; 81(4):952-80. PubMed ID: 16145787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
    Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
    Stricker BW
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The privatization of the civil commitment process and the state action doctrine: have the mentally ill been systematically stripped of their Fourteenth Amendment rights?
    Brooks W
    Duquesne Law Rev; 2001; 40(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 16518904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
    Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
    LeBlanc SM
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Middle of the road. Wakefield, Ohio, and pre-release planning for mentally-ill inmates.
    Hummert CM
    J Leg Med; 2011 Jul; 32(3):295-313. PubMed ID: 21902479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs.
    Brooks WM
    Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vitek v. Jones: transfer of prisoners to mental institutions.
    Gottlieb NR
    Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):175-207. PubMed ID: 7148833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Civil Rights--Eighth Amendment--Third Circuit Holds Parents of Mentally Ill Young Man Held in Solitary Confinement Stated Claims of Cruel and Unusual Punishment.--Palakovic v. Wetzel, 854 F.3d 209 (3d Cir. 2017).
    Harv Law Rev; 2018 Mar; 131(5):1481-8. PubMed ID: 29993227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Consequences of Official Labels: An Examination of the Rights Lost by the Mentally Ill and Mentally Incompetent Since 1989.
    Walker AM; Klein MS; Hemmens C; Stohr MK; Burton VS
    Community Ment Health J; 2016 Apr; 52(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 26403304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The two-edged sword.
    Smith WB
    JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(21):2327. PubMed ID: 490835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.