BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23837408)

  • 1. Speech production after glossectomy: methodological aspects.
    Acher A; Perrier P; Savariaux C; Fougeron C
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2014 Apr; 28(4):241-56. PubMed ID: 23837408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility after glossectomy and speech rehabilitation.
    Furia CL; Kowalski LP; Latorre MR; Angelis EC; Martins NM; Barros AP; Ribeiro KC
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Jul; 127(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 11448366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Production of tongue twisters by speakers with partial glossectomy.
    Bressmann T; Foltz A; Zimmermann J; Irish JC
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2014 Dec; 28(12):951-64. PubMed ID: 25046430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the articulation after glossectomy.
    Wakumoto M; Ohno K; Imai S; Yamashita Y; Akizuki H; Michi KI
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Nov; 23(11):764-70. PubMed ID: 8953481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonologic and Acoustic Analysis of Speech Following Glossectomy and the Effect of Rehabilitation on Speech Outcomes.
    Takatsu J; Hanai N; Suzuki H; Yoshida M; Tanaka Y; Tanaka S; Hasegawa Y; Yamamoto M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 75(7):1530-1541. PubMed ID: 28039737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech articulation after subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a myocutaneous flap.
    Knuuttila H; Pukander J; Määttä T; Pakarinen L; Vilkman E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1999; 119(5):621-6. PubMed ID: 10478607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recovery of speech following total glossectomy: an acoustic and perceptual appraisal.
    Kaipa R; Robb MP; O'Beirne GA; Allison RS
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 Feb; 14(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 22257069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech production following partial glossectomy.
    Fletcher SG
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Aug; 53(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 3398476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech evaluation after palatal augmentation in patients undergoing glossectomy.
    de Carvalho-Teles V; Sennes LU; Gielow I
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Oct; 134(10):1066-70. PubMed ID: 18936352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary study of articulatory reorganisation of fricative consonants following osteotomy.
    Wakumoto M; Isaacson KG; Friel S; Suzuki N; Gibbon F; Nixon F; Hardcastle WJ; Michi K
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1996; 48(6):275-89. PubMed ID: 8958664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic analysis of vowels following glossectomy.
    Whitehill TL; Ciocca V; Chan JC; Samman N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):135-40. PubMed ID: 16428229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound visual feedback in articulation therapy following partial glossectomy.
    Blyth KM; Mccabe P; Madill C; Ballard KJ
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 61():1-15. PubMed ID: 26994583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imprecise vowel articulation as a potential early marker of Parkinson's disease: effect of speaking task.
    Rusz J; Cmejla R; Tykalova T; Ruzickova H; Klempir J; Majerova V; Picmausova J; Roth J; Ruzicka E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2171-81. PubMed ID: 23967947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compensatory articulation patterns of a surgically treated oral cancer patient.
    Georgian DA; Logemann JA; Fisher HB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 May; 47(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 7176592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lingual frenectomy and alveolar tap production: an acoustic and perceptual study.
    Camargo ZA; Marchesan IQ; Oliveira LR; Svicero MA; Pereira LC; Madureira S
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Dec; 38(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 23826654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Longitudinal assessment of articulatory and masticatory functions following glossectomy for tongue carcinoma].
    Kudoh M
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Mar; 77(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 20415247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postglossectomy deglutitory and articulatory rehabilitation with palatal augmentation prostheses.
    Robbins KT; Bowman JB; Jacob RF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1987 Nov; 113(11):1214-8. PubMed ID: 3663349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemiglossectomy by laser. Evaluation of articulation deficits.
    Balle VB; Meilvang L; Petersen RF; Thomsen J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1990; 44(3):149-50. PubMed ID: 2255531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of speech intelligibility after a secondary dehiscence operation using an artificial graft in patients with speech disorders after partial glossectomy.
    Terai H; Shimahara M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 42(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 15121261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Appraisal of Function After Rehabilitation With Tongue Prosthesis.
    Kharade P; Dholam K; Bachher G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):e41-e44. PubMed ID: 29023298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.