These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23838096)

  • 1. Development and implementation of a low-cost phantom for quality control in cone beam computed tomography.
    Batista WO; Navarro MV; Maia AF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):552-60. PubMed ID: 23838096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a phantom and a methodology for evaluation of depth kerma and kerma index for dental cone beam computed tomography.
    Batista WO; Navarro MV; Maia AF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 23838099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of two phantoms for quality control in cone-beam CT.
    Gomes Batista WO
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Aug; 138():29-34. PubMed ID: 28764971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A phantom for simplified image quality control of dental cone beam computed tomography units.
    Torgersen GR; Hol C; Møystad A; Hellén-Halme K; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Nov; 118(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 25442498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction.
    Pauwels R; Seynaeve L; Henriques JC; de Oliveira-Santos C; Souza PC; Westphalen FH; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Rockenbach MI; Haiter-Neto F; Pittayapat P; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150108. PubMed ID: 26090934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and applicability of a quality control phantom for dental cone-beam CT.
    Pauwels R; Stamatakis H; Manousaridis G; Walker A; Michielsen K; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R; Horner K; Tsiklakis K;
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 12(4):3478. PubMed ID: 22089004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom.
    Bamba J; Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20120445. PubMed ID: 23956235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simplified low-cost phantom for image quality assessment of dental cone beam computed tomography unit.
    Rabba JA; Jaafar HA; Suhaimi FM; Jafri MZM; Osman ND
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2024 Mar; 71(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 37965811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
    Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-quality image acquisition by double exposure overlap in dental cone beam computed tomography.
    Plachtovics M; Bujtar P; Nagy K; Mommaerts M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Jun; 117(6):760-7. PubMed ID: 24736110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assurance phantoms for cone beam computed tomography: a systematic literature review.
    de Oliveira MV; Wenzel A; Campos PS; Spin-Neto R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):20160329. PubMed ID: 28045345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental evaluation of actual delivered dose using mega-voltage cone-beam CT and direct point dose measurement.
    Matsubara K; Kohno R; Nishioka S; Shibuya T; Ariji T; Akimoto T; Saitoh H
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 23266165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region.
    Elstrøm UV; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
    Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):908-17. PubMed ID: 21767191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correction of image artifacts from treatment couch in cone-beam CT from kV on-board imaging.
    Ali I; Ahmad S; Alsbou N; Lovelock DM; Kriminski S; Amols H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2011; 19(3):321-32. PubMed ID: 21876282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
    Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of CBCT reconstruction and calibration for radiotherapy planning in the head and neck region - a phantom study.
    Elstrøm UV; Olsen SR; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
    Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1114-24. PubMed ID: 24975372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing image acquisition settings for cone-beam computed tomography in supine and prone breast radiotherapy.
    De Puysseleyr A; Veldeman L; Bogaert E; De Wagter C; De Neve W
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Aug; 100(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 21377749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Online geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography for arbitrary imaging objects.
    Meng Y; Gong H; Yang X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Feb; 32(2):278-88. PubMed ID: 23076032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography.
    Araki K; Okano T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):862-5. PubMed ID: 22092375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners.
    Pauwels R; Beinsberger J; Stamatakis H; Tsiklakis K; Walker A; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R; Horner K;
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jul; 114(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 22727102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.