These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23838923)
1. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Lee L; Sudarshan M; Li C; Latimer E; Fried GM; Mulder DS; Feldman LS; Ferri LE Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 20(12):3732-9. PubMed ID: 23838923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB Ann Surg; 2012 Feb; 255(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22173202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Yanasoot A; Yolsuriyanwong K; Ruangsin S; Laohawiriyakamol S; Sunpaweravong S Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2017; 25(7-8):513-517. PubMed ID: 28871799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Verhage RJ; Hazebroek EJ; Boone J; Van Hillegersberg R Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 19365314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy versus chemoradiation alone in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Salcedo J; Suen SC; Bian SX Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):440-446. PubMed ID: 31749330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: an exploratory study in two centers. Parameswaran R; Titcomb DR; Blencowe NS; Berrisford RG; Wajed SA; Streets CG; Hollowood AD; Krysztopik R; Barham CP; Blazeby JM Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):1970-7. PubMed ID: 23306956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Decker G; Coosemans W; De Leyn P; Decaluwé H; Nafteux P; Van Raemdonck D; Lerut T Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):13-20; discussion 20-1. PubMed ID: 18952454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial. Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Cuesta MA; Daams F; Roig Garcia J; Bonavina L; Rosman C; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL Ann Surg; 2017 Aug; 266(2):232-236. PubMed ID: 28187044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Zingg U; McQuinn A; DiValentino D; Esterman AJ; Bessell JR; Thompson SK; Jamieson GG; Watson DI Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 87(3):911-9. PubMed ID: 19231418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre. Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-utility analysis of minimally invasive versus open multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis. Parker SL; Adogwa O; Davis BJ; Fulchiero E; Aaronson O; Cheng J; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Feb; 26(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 21959840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrathoracic versus Cervical ANastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial. van Workum F; Bouwense SA; Luyer MD; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van der Peet DL; Daams F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Gisbertz SS; Henegouwen MI; Heisterkamp J; Langenhoff BS; Martijnse IS; Grutters JP; Klarenbeek BR; Rovers MM; Rosman C Trials; 2016 Oct; 17(1):505. PubMed ID: 27756419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Luketich JD; Alvelo-Rivera M; Buenaventura PO; Christie NA; McCaughan JS; Litle VR; Schauer PR; Close JM; Fernando HC Ann Surg; 2003 Oct; 238(4):486-94; discussion 494-5. PubMed ID: 14530720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early cancer in Barrett's esophagus: a decision analysis. Pohl H; Sonnenberg A; Strobel S; Eckardt A; Rösch T Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Oct; 70(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 19394011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]