149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23839121)
1. A statistical model of breast cancer tumour growth with estimation of screening sensitivity as a function of mammographic density.
Abrahamsson L; Humphreys K
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1620-37. PubMed ID: 23839121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modelling breast cancer tumour growth for a stable disease population.
Isheden G; Humphreys K
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Mar; 28(3):681-702. PubMed ID: 29103360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of mammographic density and compressed breast thickness on true mammographic sensitivity: a cohort study.
Strandberg R; Illipse M; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):14194. PubMed ID: 37648804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hormone replacement therapy, percent mammographic density, and sensitivity of mammography.
Kavanagh AM; Cawson J; Byrnes GB; Giles GG; Marr G; Tong B; Gertig DM; Hopper JL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1060-4. PubMed ID: 15894653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years.
Buist DS; Porter PL; Lehman C; Taplin SH; White E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1432-40. PubMed ID: 15467032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic screening and mammographic patterns.
Day N; Warren R
Breast Cancer Res; 2000; 2(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 11250716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection.
Chiarelli AM; Kirsh VA; Klar NS; Shumak R; Jong R; Fishell E; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1856-62. PubMed ID: 17035392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer tumour growth modelling for studying the association of body size with tumour growth rate and symptomatic detection using case-control data.
Abrahamsson L; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():116. PubMed ID: 26293658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumour size at detection according to different measures of mammographic breast density.
Nickson C; Kavanagh AM
J Med Screen; 2009; 16(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 19805755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction.
Vachon CM; van Gils CH; Sellers TA; Ghosh K; Pruthi S; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS
Breast Cancer Res; 2007; 9(6):217. PubMed ID: 18190724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Addition of Automated Breast Ultrasound to Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening Decreases Stage at Diagnosis.
Grady I; Chanisheva N; Vasquez T
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1570-1574. PubMed ID: 28760362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography.
Wanders JO; Holland K; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; Pijnappel RM; Peeters PH; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Feb; 162(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 28012087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Rosenberg RD; Hunt WC; Williamson MR; Gilliland FD; Wiest PW; Kelsey CA; Key CR; Linver MN
Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):511-8. PubMed ID: 9807581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longitudinal fluctuation in mammographic percent density differentiates between interval and screen-detected breast cancer.
Strand F; Humphreys K; Eriksson M; Li J; Andersson TM; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
Int J Cancer; 2017 Jan; 140(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 27615710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating Distributions of Breast Cancer Onset and Growth in a Swedish Mammography Screening Cohort.
Strandberg R; Czene K; Eriksson M; Hall P; Humphreys K
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2022 Mar; 31(3):569-577. PubMed ID: 35027432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of disease progression parameters from case-control data: application to mammographic patterns and breast cancer natural history.
Couto E; Harrison D; Duffy S; Myles J; Sala E; Warren R; Day N; Luben R; Chen H
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2001; 6(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 11434503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
