151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2383987)
1. A left versus right side comparative study of Finn Chamber patch tests in 220 consecutive patients.
Lindelöf B
Contact Dermatitis; 1990 May; 22(5):288-9. PubMed ID: 2383987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Finn chamber patch test technique.
Fischer T; Maibach H
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 6499413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reproducibility of epicutaneous test results].
Szliska C; Rakoski J
Z Hautkr; 1988; 63 Suppl 4():67-9. PubMed ID: 2978100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patch testing for contact dermatitis.
Treadgold A
Nursing (Lond); 1983 Jan; 2(9):255-8. PubMed ID: 6554529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Chamber test versus patch test for epicutaneous testing.
Pirilä V
Contact Dermatitis; 1975; 1(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 1235071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.
Fischer T; Maibach H
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 6525822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber test results.
Gollhausen R; Przybilla B; Ring J
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):843-6. PubMed ID: 2600211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The American Academy of Dermatology patch test series for contact dermatitis.
Kanof NB
Int J Dermatol; 1977 Dec; 16(10):827-9. PubMed ID: 598954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. European multicenter study of the TRUE Test.
Lachapelle JM; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Hannuksela M; Ring J; White IR; Wilkinson J; Fischer T; Billberg K
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 3180789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber patch test techniques in Singapore.
Goh CL
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Aug; 27(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 1395634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patch testing.
McGillis ST; Burrall BA; Huntley AC
Clin Rev Allergy; 1989; 7(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 2691044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Allergic contact dermatitis. Common allergens.
Glass LF; Huntley AC
Clin Rev Allergy; 1989; 7(4):381-98. PubMed ID: 2691042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A left versus right side comparative study of Epiquick patch test results in 100 consecutive patients.
Lachapelle JM
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2914436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is a 5% nickel sulphate patch test concentration adequate?
Dooms-Goossens A; Naert C; Chrispeels MT; Degreef H
Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Apr; 6(3):232. PubMed ID: 7389344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Some thoughts on the technique of epicutaneous tests (author's transl)].
Novák M
Cesk Dermatol; 1981 Aug; 56(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 7273160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Antigen preparation for the patch test.
Fischer T; Maibach HI
Occup Med; 1986; 1(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 3303375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch testing with colophony.
Fregert S; Gruvberger B
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 6499414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patch testing with primin in white petrolatum.
Schubert HJ; Prater E; Sell M
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):286. PubMed ID: 4085239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Patch tests: interpretation of results (author's transl)].
Sertoli A; Fabbri P; Spallanzani P
Med Lav; 1980; 71(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 6450316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Skin tests in the study of primary irritancy of various components of detergents].
Moskalewska K; Olak E; Polkowska M
Przegl Dermatol; 1978; 65(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 725098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
