204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23840114)
1. Assessment of vascular invasion in gastric cancer: a comparative study.
Gresta LT; Rodrigues-Júnior IA; de Castro LP; Cassali GD; Cabral MM
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 19(24):3761-9. PubMed ID: 23840114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunohistochemical assessment of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in T1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
Gakis G; Todenhöfer T; Braun M; Fend F; Stenzl A; Perner S
Scand J Urol; 2015; 49(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 25921278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical significance of detecting lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in stage II colon cancer using markers D2-40 and CD34 in combination.
Lai JH; Zhou YJ; Bin D; Qiangchen ; Wang SY
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(3):1363-7. PubMed ID: 24606466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distinguishing blood and lymph vessel invasion in breast cancer: a prospective immunohistochemical study.
Van den Eynden GG; Van der Auwera I; Van Laere SJ; Colpaert CG; van Dam P; Dirix LY; Vermeulen PB; Van Marck EA
Br J Cancer; 2006 Jun; 94(11):1643-9. PubMed ID: 16670715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tumor cell invasion in blood vessels assessed by immunohistochemistry is related to decreased survival in patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy.
Carlsen B; Klingen TA; Andreassen BK; Haug ES
Diagn Pathol; 2021 Nov; 16(1):109. PubMed ID: 34809660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of immunohistochemically detected blood and lymphatic vessel invasion in colorectal carcinoma: its impact on prognosis.
Liang P; Nakada I; Hong JW; Tabuchi T; Motohashi G; Takemura A; Nakachi T; Kasuga T; Tabuchi T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):470-7. PubMed ID: 17103258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The prognostic value of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in operable breast cancer.
Lauria R; Perrone F; Carlomagno C; De Laurentiis M; Morabito A; Gallo C; Varriale E; Pettinato G; Panico L; Petrella G
Cancer; 1995 Nov; 76(10):1772-8. PubMed ID: 8625046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of lymphovascular invasion by D2-40 (podoplanin) immunoexpression in endometrial cancer.
Weber SK; Sauerwald A; Pölcher M; Braun M; Debald M; Serce NB; Kuhn W; Brunagel-Walgenbach G; Rudlowski C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1442-8. PubMed ID: 22964524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical significance of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in oral tongue squamous cell carcinomas.
Michikawa C; Uzawa N; Kayamori K; Sonoda I; Ohyama Y; Okada N; Yamaguchi A; Amagasa T
Oral Oncol; 2012 Apr; 48(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 22178206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reevaluation of lymphovascular invasion in gastric cancer using endothelial markers D2-40 and EVG: Enhanced detection, better predictor of lymph node metastasis and biological aggressiveness.
Liu J; Li H; Zhou P; Cai T; Tang Z; Wang Y; Cui Y; Sun Y; Wang X
J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 123(8):1736-1741. PubMed ID: 33772776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunohistochemical evaluation of lymphovascular invasion in carcinoma breast with CD34 and D2-40 and its correlation with other prognostic markers.
Agarwal S; Singh A; Bagga PK
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2018; 61(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 29567882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Significant effects of lymph and blood vascular invasion on the prognosis of early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Zhang Y; Yan M; He J; Sun J; Sun X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1015-22. PubMed ID: 20846259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence and prognostic significance of vascular invasion in 529 gastric-cancer patients.
Gabbert HE; Meier S; Gerharz CD; Hommel G
Int J Cancer; 1991 Sep; 49(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 1879965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multivariate analysis of blood vessel and lymph vessel invasion as predictors of ovarian and lymph node metastases in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Sakuragi N; Takeda N; Hareyama H; Fujimoto T; Todo Y; Okamoto K; Takeda M; Wada Si; Yamamoto R; Fujimoto S
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 88(11):2578-83. PubMed ID: 10861436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved methods of detection of lymphovascular invasion demonstrate that it is the predominant method of vascular invasion in breast cancer and has important clinical consequences.
Mohammed RA; Martin SG; Gill MS; Green AR; Paish EC; Ellis IO
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Dec; 31(12):1825-33. PubMed ID: 18043036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effect of lymphatic vascular invasion on the prognosis of stage I( gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy].
Shang L; Li B; He F; Li Y; Li J; Zhao Q; Li M
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 21(2):175-179. PubMed ID: 29492916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of pathological evaluation for lymphatic vessel invasion in invasive breast cancer.
Ito M; Moriya T; Ishida T; Usami S; Kasajima A; Sasano H; Ohuchi N
Breast Cancer; 2007; 14(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 17986803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymph vascular invasion in invasive mammary carcinomas identified by the endothelial lymphatic marker D2-40 is associated with other indicators of poor prognosis.
Marinho VF; Metze K; Sanches FS; Rocha GF; Gobbi H
BMC Cancer; 2008 Feb; 8():64. PubMed ID: 18307818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunostaining with D2-40 improves evaluation of lymphovascular invasion, but may not predict sentinel lymph node status in early breast cancer.
Britto AV; Schenka AA; Moraes-Schenka NG; Alvarenga M; Shinzato JY; Vassallo J; Ward LS
BMC Cancer; 2009 Apr; 9():109. PubMed ID: 19356249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Significance of Lymphatic Infiltration Detected by Immunohistochemical Double Staining in Patients with Endometrial Cancer.
Xu J; Wang X; Du Q; Qu P; Liu C
Clin Med Insights Oncol; 2023; 17():11795549231152308. PubMed ID: 36744170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
