These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23841237)

  • 1. The Lancet against Israel.
    Israeli E; Shoenfeld Y
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2013 May; 15(5):203-4. PubMed ID: 23841237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The absurdity of the situation in the Middle East--a lesson for the Lancet.
    Rivkind AI; Coleman S
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2013 Jul; 15(7):394. PubMed ID: 23943994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The absurdity of the situation in the Middle East--a lesson for the Lancet.
    Konikoff T; Eshkol A
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2013 Jul; 15(7):393-4. PubMed ID: 23943993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A boycott by passport.
    Psychoanal Rev; 2002 Aug; 89(4):463-4. PubMed ID: 12616812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corresponding authors: Is there fame bias in editorial choice?
    Mahian O
    Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7544):414. PubMed ID: 25810195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Israel and The Lancet.
    Lancet; 1989 Mar; 1(8639):676. PubMed ID: 2564497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Position statement from ADA/AACE/EASD/TES in response to a recently published letter to the editor in The Lancet and an editorial addressing the Israeli-Palestinian fighting in Gaza.
    Am J Nephrol; 2014; 40(6):592. PubMed ID: 25613796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working double-blind.
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7179):605-6. PubMed ID: 18256621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data analysis: Check the rejects for fame bias too.
    Nespoli D
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7551):161. PubMed ID: 25971499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New BMJ policy on economic evaluations. Will the Lancet play ball?
    McCabe CJ; Roberts J
    BMJ; 2003 Feb; 326(7386):445; author reply 445. PubMed ID: 12599324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editorial boards: where are all the women?
    Robinson S; Lecky F; Mason S
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2010 Apr; 17(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 19841586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editorial policy: industry funding and editorial independence.
    MacDonald N; Downie J
    CMAJ; 2006 Jun; 174(13):1817, 1819. PubMed ID: 16785448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Editorial note.
    Palmer B
    Eur Eat Disord Rev; 2010 Mar; 18(2):78. PubMed ID: 20148393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opening editorial.
    DeSteno D
    Emotion; 2012 Feb; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 22309733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [IUpdating the editorial board directive].
    Ağildere AM
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Mar; 9(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 14661282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editorial and retrospective 2008.
    Rieseberg L; Smith H
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(2):501-7. PubMed ID: 18205673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry editorial policies and ethical guidelines.
    Roth KA
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2006 Feb; 54(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 16418501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editorial report 2010.
    Lameire N; Wheeler DC; Floege J
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Jan; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 21177521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editorial independence at the BMJ:.and the author apologises unreservedly.
    Sackett DL
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):624-5. PubMed ID: 15361455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Our editorial process--some experiences and reflections.
    Emmelin M; Wall S
    Scand J Public Health; 2003; 31(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 12850969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.