These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23841282)

  • 1. [An overview of reporting standards for a series of systematic reviews of international clinical trials].
    Liao X; Xie YM; Shen H
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 33(4):549-53. PubMed ID: 23841282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological standards in medical reporting.
    Sporbeck B; Jacobs A; Hartmann V; Nast A
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2013 Feb; 11(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 23279950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement on minimum standards and exemplary attributes of clinical trial sites.
    Zon R; Meropol NJ; Catalano RB; Schilsky RL
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(15):2562-7. PubMed ID: 18390967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review on reporting guidelines of clinical research in evidence based medicine.
    Liao X; Wang GQ; Xie YM
    Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 40(13):2542-7. PubMed ID: 26697675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
    Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized trials published in Chinese or Western journals: comparative empirical analysis.
    Purgato M; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2012 Jun; 32(3):354-61. PubMed ID: 22544018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ensuring inclusion of research reports in systematic reviews.
    Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S60-9. PubMed ID: 19892076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals].
    Liu JP; Xia Y
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 27(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 17526167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Education section - reporting of systematic reviews.
    J Evid Based Med; 2013 May; 6(2):122-3. PubMed ID: 23829809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when they are useful and when to be careful.
    Noordzij M; Hooft L; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Dec; 76(11):1130-6. PubMed ID: 19727062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
    Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of the decision-making process for the selection of therapeutics to undergo clinical testing for spinal cord injury in the North American Clinical Trials Network.
    Guest J; Harrop JS; Aarabi B; Grossman RG; Fawcett JW; Fehlings MG; Tator CH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(1 Suppl):94-101. PubMed ID: 22985376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of systematic reviews in clinical research and practice.
    Haines T; McKnight L; Duku E; Perry L; Thoma A
    Clin Plast Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 18298993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.
    Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.