These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23841832)

  • 1. Safety of low-dose prostaglandin E2 induction in grandmultiparous women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Haas J; Barzilay E; Chayen B; Lebovitz O; Yinon Y; Mazaki-Tovi S; Harel L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Mar; 27(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 23841832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety of labor induction with prostaglandin E2 in grandmultiparous women.
    Haas J; Barzilay E; Chayen B; Lebovitz O; Yinon Y; Hendler I; Harel L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 22928497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of spontaneous labor with induced vaginal tablets prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparae.
    Sobande AA; Al-Bar HM; Archibong EI
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug; 22(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 11573116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section.
    Bouchghoul H; Zeino S; Houllier M; Senat MV
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 49(4):101699. PubMed ID: 32018044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uterine rupture with the use of PGE2 vaginal inserts for labor induction in women with previous cesarean sections.
    Taylor DR; Doughty AS; Kaufman H; Yang L; Iannucci TA
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Jul; 47(7):549-54. PubMed ID: 12170531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix.
    Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Lahav E; Horowitz E; Hod M; Kaplan B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Oct; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15358459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oxytocin versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor after previous cesarean section: a retrospective comparative study.
    Gómez LR; Burgos J; Cobos P; Melchor JC; Osuna C; Centeno Mdel M; Larrieta R; Fernández-Llebrez L; Martínez-Astorquiza T
    J Perinat Med; 2011 Jul; 39(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 21604996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: A French retrospective study.
    Vecchioli E; Cordier AG; Chantry A; Benachi A; Monier I
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237132. PubMed ID: 32764773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus spontaneous of labor in grand multiparous women.
    Zamzami TY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 273(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 16160873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mode of delivery in pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes at or before term following induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Glickman H; Bar J; Kaplan B; Hod M
    Am J Perinatol; 2004 Jul; 21(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 15232758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section.
    Kehl S; Weiss C; Wamsler M; Beyer J; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Schleussner E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 26437956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short stature and vaginal dinoprostone as independent predictors of composite maternal-newborn adverse outcomes in induction of labor after one previous cesarean: a retrospective cohort study.
    Tan SP; Bashirudin SB; Rajaratnam RK; Gan F
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Jul; 24(1):455. PubMed ID: 38951754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uterine rupture during trial of labor: controversy of induction's methods.
    Ophir E; Odeh M; Hirsch Y; Bornstein J
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2012 Nov; 67(11):734-45. PubMed ID: 23151757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: risk of uterine rupture with labor induction.
    Ouzounian JG; Miller DA; Hiebert CJ; Battista LR; Lee RH
    Am J Perinatol; 2011 Sep; 28(8):593-6. PubMed ID: 21424988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
    Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pregnancy outcome after induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section.
    Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Ben-Zion M; Brezovsky A; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 24749798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a multicenter study of patients with prior cesarean delivery.
    Flamm BL; Anton D; Goings JR; Newman J
    Am J Perinatol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 9259919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure.
    Durnwald C; Mercer B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 15280110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.