241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23842810)
1. A comparative analysis of algorithms for somatic SNV detection in cancer.
Roberts ND; Kortschak RD; Parker WT; Schreiber AW; Branford S; Scott HS; Glonek G; Adelson DL
Bioinformatics; 2013 Sep; 29(18):2223-30. PubMed ID: 23842810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of somatic mutation calling methods in amplicon and whole exome sequence data.
Xu H; DiCarlo J; Satya RV; Peng Q; Wang Y
BMC Genomics; 2014 Mar; 15():244. PubMed ID: 24678773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SECEDO: SNV-based subclone detection using ultra-low coverage single-cell DNA sequencing.
Rozhoňová H; Danciu D; Stark S; Rätsch G; Kahles A; Lehmann KV
Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(18):4293-4300. PubMed ID: 35900151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FaSD-somatic: a fast and accurate somatic SNV detection algorithm for cancer genome sequencing data.
Wang W; Wang P; Xu F; Luo R; Wong MP; Lam TW; Wang J
Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):2498-500. PubMed ID: 24833803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing.
Koboldt DC; Zhang Q; Larson DE; Shen D; McLellan MD; Lin L; Miller CA; Mardis ER; Ding L; Wilson RK
Genome Res; 2012 Mar; 22(3):568-76. PubMed ID: 22300766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers.
Wang Q; Jia P; Li F; Chen H; Ji H; Hucks D; Dahlman KB; Pao W; Zhao Z
Genome Med; 2013; 5(10):91. PubMed ID: 24112718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. JointSNVMix: a probabilistic model for accurate detection of somatic mutations in normal/tumour paired next-generation sequencing data.
Roth A; Ding J; Morin R; Crisan A; Ha G; Giuliany R; Bashashati A; Hirst M; Turashvili G; Oloumi A; Marra MA; Aparicio S; Shah SP
Bioinformatics; 2012 Apr; 28(7):907-13. PubMed ID: 22285562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. QQ-SNV: single nucleotide variant detection at low frequency by comparing the quality quantiles.
Van der Borght K; Thys K; Wetzels Y; Clement L; Verbist B; Reumers J; van Vlijmen H; Aerssens J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():379. PubMed ID: 26554718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feature-based classifiers for somatic mutation detection in tumour-normal paired sequencing data.
Ding J; Bashashati A; Roth A; Oloumi A; Tse K; Zeng T; Haffari G; Hirst M; Marra MA; Condon A; Aparicio S; Shah SP
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jan; 28(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 22084253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Germline contamination and leakage in whole genome somatic single nucleotide variant detection.
Sendorek DH; Caloian C; Ellrott K; Bare JC; Yamaguchi TN; Ewing AD; Houlahan KE; Norman TC; Margolin AA; Stuart JM; Boutros PC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):28. PubMed ID: 29385983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In-depth comparison of somatic point mutation callers based on different tumor next-generation sequencing depth data.
Cai L; Yuan W; Zhang Z; He L; Chou KC
Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():36540. PubMed ID: 27874022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Construction of a combinatorial pipeline using two somatic variant calling methods for whole exome sequence data of gastric cancer.
Kohmoto T; Masuda K; Naruto T; Tange S; Shoda K; Hamada J; Saito M; Ichikawa D; Tajima A; Otsuji E; Imoto I
J Med Invest; 2017; 64(3.4):233-240. PubMed ID: 28954988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs.
Saunders CT; Wong WS; Swamy S; Becq J; Murray LJ; Cheetham RK
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 28(14):1811-7. PubMed ID: 22581179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mutation discovery in regions of segmental cancer genome amplifications with CoNAn-SNV: a mixture model for next generation sequencing of tumors.
Crisan A; Goya R; Ha G; Ding J; Prentice LM; Oloumi A; Senz J; Zeng T; Tse K; Delaney A; Marra MA; Huntsman DG; Hirst M; Aparicio S; Shah S
PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e41551. PubMed ID: 22916110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A three-caller pipeline for variant analysis of cancer whole-exome sequencing data.
Liu ZK; Shang YK; Chen ZN; Bian H
Mol Med Rep; 2017 May; 15(5):2489-2494. PubMed ID: 28447726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA.
Kockan C; Hach F; Sarrafi I; Bell RH; McConeghy B; Beja K; Haegert A; Wyatt AW; Volik SV; Chi KN; Collins CC; Sahinalp SC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 27531099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
