These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23842814)

  • 1. A new framework for computational protein design through cost function network optimization.
    Traoré S; Allouche D; André I; de Givry S; Katsirelos G; Schiex T; Barbe S
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Sep; 29(17):2129-36. PubMed ID: 23842814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast search algorithms for computational protein design.
    Traoré S; Roberts KE; Allouche D; Donald BR; André I; Schiex T; Barbe S
    J Comput Chem; 2016 May; 37(12):1048-58. PubMed ID: 26833706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deterministic Search Methods for Computational Protein Design.
    Traoré S; Allouche D; André I; Schiex T; Barbe S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():107-123. PubMed ID: 27914047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positive multistate protein design.
    Vucinic J; Simoncini D; Ruffini M; Barbe S; Schiex T
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jan; 36(1):122-130. PubMed ID: 31199465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variable Neighborhood Search with Cost Function Networks To Solve Large Computational Protein Design Problems.
    Charpentier A; Mignon D; Barbe S; Cortes J; Schiex T; Simonson T; Allouche D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):127-136. PubMed ID: 30380857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BBK* (Branch and Bound Over K*): A Provable and Efficient Ensemble-Based Protein Design Algorithm to Optimize Stability and Binding Affinity Over Large Sequence Spaces.
    Ojewole AA; Jou JD; Fowler VG; Donald BR
    J Comput Biol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):726-739. PubMed ID: 29641249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guaranteed Discrete Energy Optimization on Large Protein Design Problems.
    Simoncini D; Allouche D; de Givry S; Delmas C; Barbe S; Schiex T
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Dec; 11(12):5980-9. PubMed ID: 26610100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational Protein Design Using AND/OR Branch-and-Bound Search.
    Zhou Y; Wu Y; Zeng J
    J Comput Biol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):439-51. PubMed ID: 27167301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parallel Computational Protein Design.
    Zhou Y; Donald BR; Zeng J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():265-277. PubMed ID: 27914056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. OSPREY Predicts Resistance Mutations Using Positive and Negative Computational Protein Design.
    Ojewole A; Lowegard A; Gainza P; Reeve SM; Georgiev I; Anderson AC; Donald BR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():291-306. PubMed ID: 27914058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Framework of Computational Protein Design.
    Samish I
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():3-19. PubMed ID: 27914044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multistate Computational Protein Design with Backbone Ensembles.
    Davey JA; Chica RA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():161-179. PubMed ID: 27914050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rosetta:MSF: a modular framework for multi-state computational protein design.
    Löffler P; Schmitz S; Hupfeld E; Sterner R; Merkl R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 13(6):e1005600. PubMed ID: 28604768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast gap-free enumeration of conformations and sequences for protein design.
    Roberts KE; Gainza P; Hallen MA; Donald BR
    Proteins; 2015 Oct; 83(10):1859-1877. PubMed ID: 26235965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iterated local search with partition crossover for computational protein design.
    Beuvin F; de Givry S; Schiex T; Verel S; Simoncini D
    Proteins; 2021 Nov; 89(11):1522-1529. PubMed ID: 34228826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved Pruning algorithms and Divide-and-Conquer strategies for Dead-End Elimination, with application to protein design.
    Georgiev I; Lilien RH; Donald BR
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e174-83. PubMed ID: 16873469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational Protein Design Under a Given Backbone Structure with the ABACUS Statistical Energy Function.
    Xiong P; Chen Q; Liu H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():217-226. PubMed ID: 27914053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. cOSPREY: A Cloud-Based Distributed Algorithm for Large-Scale Computational Protein Design.
    Pan Y; Dong Y; Zhou J; Hallen M; Donald BR; Zeng J; Xu W
    J Comput Biol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):737-49. PubMed ID: 27154509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An efficient parallel algorithm for accelerating computational protein design.
    Zhou Y; Xu W; Donald BR; Zeng J
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):i255-i263. PubMed ID: 24931991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LUTE (Local Unpruned Tuple Expansion): Accurate Continuously Flexible Protein Design with General Energy Functions and Rigid Rotamer-Like Efficiency.
    Hallen MA; Jou JD; Donald BR
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):536-546. PubMed ID: 27681371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.