164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23843074)
21. Survey of semen analysis practices in India and need for standardization and improvement.
Kale S; Bathe S; Agrawal R; More P; Bharadwaj E
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2022; 65(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 35074975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. WHO reference values for human semen.
Tocci A; Lucchini C
Hum Reprod Update; 2010; 16(5):559; author reply 559. PubMed ID: 20542895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The statistical foundation of the reference population for semen analysis included in the sixth edition of the WHO manual: a critical reappraisal of the evidence.
Paffoni A; Somigliana E; Boeri L; Viganò P
Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2237-2245. PubMed ID: 35849333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can we disregard geography when using the World Health Organization semen analysis reference ranges?
Khodamoradi K; Ibrahim E
Fertil Steril; 2022 Sep; 118(3):483. PubMed ID: 35934539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comments on the release of the 5th edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen.
Ford WC
Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 20111082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline PART II.
Schlegel PN; Sigman M; Collura B; De Jonge CJ; Eisenberg ML; Lamb DJ; Mulhall JP; Niederberger C; Sandlow JI; Sokol RZ; Spandorfer SD; Tanrikut C; Treadwell JR; Oristaglio JT; Zini A
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 33295258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline Part I.
Schlegel PN; Sigman M; Collura B; De Jonge CJ; Eisenberg ML; Lamb DJ; Mulhall JP; Niederberger C; Sandlow JI; Sokol RZ; Spandorfer SD; Tanrikut C; Treadwell JR; Oristaglio JT; Zini A
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 33295257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Our experience in sperm morphology assessment.
Ariagno JI; Curi SM; Chenlo P; Repetto HE; Pugliese MN; Palaoro LA; Sardi M; Mendeluk GR
Asian J Androl; 2011 Mar; 13(2):201-2. PubMed ID: 21076434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Re: Analysis of Semen Parameters in Male Referrals: Impact of Reference Limits, Stratification by Fertility Categories, Predictors of Change, and Comparison of Normal Semen Parameters in Subfertile Couples.
Niederberger C
J Urol; 2015 Sep; 194(3):764. PubMed ID: 26292891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The past, present, and future of the semen analysis.
Eisenberg ML
Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):235-236. PubMed ID: 34986983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. What is normal semen quality? On the use and abuse of reference limits for the interpretation of semen analysis results.
Björndahl L
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2011 Sep; 14(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 21770820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of male factor.
Pacey AA
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Dec; 26(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 22695468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fertility managment in testicular cancer: the need to establish a standardized and evidence-based patient-centric pathway.
Moody JA; Ahmed K; Yap T; Minhas S; Shabbir M
BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):160-172. PubMed ID: 29920910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion.
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Fertil Steril; 2012 Aug; 98(2):294-301. PubMed ID: 22698639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Are WHO Recommendations to Perform 2 Consecutive Semen Analyses for Reliable Diagnosis of Male Infertility Still Valid?
Blickenstorfer K; Voelkle M; Xie M; Fröhlich A; Imthurn B; Leeners B
J Urol; 2019 Apr; 201(4):783-791. PubMed ID: 30423309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Overview of current approaches to the evaluation and management of male infertility.
Choy JT; Ellsworth P
Urol Nurs; 2012; 32(6):286-94, 304 quiz 295. PubMed ID: 23362697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The physical properties of seminal fluid-reproducibility and intrasubject variation?
Amelar RD
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1798-9; author reply 1799. PubMed ID: 16359998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Limits of current male fertility testing.
Oehninger S; Ombelet W
Fertil Steril; 2019 May; 111(5):835-841. PubMed ID: 30975387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multi-center evaluation of oxidation-reduction potential by the MiOXSYS in males with abnormal semen.
Agarwal A; Panner Selvam MK; Arafa M; Okada H; Homa S; Killeen A; Balaban B; Saleh R; Armagan A; Roychoudhury S; Sikka S
Asian J Androl; 2019; 21(6):565-569. PubMed ID: 31006711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 'How to count sperm properly': checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis.
Björndahl L; Barratt CL; Mortimer D; Jouannet P
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 26682580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
