These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23844579)

  • 21. Parametric and nonparametric FDR estimation revisited.
    Wu B; Guan Z; Zhao H
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):735-44. PubMed ID: 16984315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bon-EV: an improved multiple testing procedure for controlling false discovery rates.
    Li D; Xie Z; Zand M; Fogg T; Dye T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data.
    Lai Y
    Biostatistics; 2007 Oct; 8(4):744-55. PubMed ID: 17244594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Molecular staging of intracranial ependymoma in children and adults.
    Korshunov A; Witt H; Hielscher T; Benner A; Remke M; Ryzhova M; Milde T; Bender S; Wittmann A; Schöttler A; Kulozik AE; Witt O; von Deimling A; Lichter P; Pfister S
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Jul; 28(19):3182-90. PubMed ID: 20516456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
    Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An enhanced quantile approach for assessing differential gene expressions.
    Wang H; He X
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 18325069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. fdrtool: a versatile R package for estimating local and tail area-based false discovery rates.
    Strimmer K
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jun; 24(12):1461-2. PubMed ID: 18441000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating p-values in small microarray experiments.
    Yang H; Churchill G
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17077100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semi-parametric differential expression analysis via partial mixture estimation.
    Rossell D; Guerra R; Scott C
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article15. PubMed ID: 18454730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sample size calculation with dependence adjustment for FDR-control in microarray studies.
    Shao Y; Tseng CH
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4219-37. PubMed ID: 17328091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simultaneous confidence regions corresponding to Holm's step-down procedure and other closed-testing procedures.
    Guilbaud O
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):678-92. PubMed ID: 18932131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the probability of correct selection for large k populations, with application to microarray data.
    Cui X; Wilson J
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):870-83. PubMed ID: 18932145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols.
    Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 17722203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures.
    Bretz F; Maurer W; Brannath W; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):586-604. PubMed ID: 19051220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni-based multiple tests.
    Burman CF; Sonesson C; Guilbaud O
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):739-61. PubMed ID: 19142850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improved estimation of the noncentrality parameter distribution from a large number of t-statistics, with applications to false discovery rate estimation in microarray data analysis.
    Qu L; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1178-87. PubMed ID: 22551000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.