These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23844579)

  • 41. Testing the prediction error difference between 2 predictors.
    van de Wiel MA; Berkhof J; van Wieringen WN
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jul; 10(3):550-60. PubMed ID: 19380517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessing differential gene expression with small sample sizes in oligonucleotide arrays using a mean-variance model.
    Hu J; Wright FA
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17447928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Estimation of false discovery rates in multiple testing: application to gene microarray data.
    Tsai CA; Hsueh HM; Chen JJ
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1071-81. PubMed ID: 14969487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Stepwise gatekeeping procedures in clinical trial applications.
    Dmitrienko A; Tamhane AC; Wang X; Chen X
    Biom J; 2006 Dec; 48(6):984-91. PubMed ID: 17240656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A two-step multiple comparison procedure for a large number of tests and multiple treatments.
    Jiang H; Doerge RW
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article28. PubMed ID: 17402912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An adaptive single-step FDR procedure with applications to DNA microarray analysis.
    Iyer V; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 17342954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Robust depth-based tools for the analysis of gene expression data.
    López-Pintado S; Romo J; Torrente A
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):254-64. PubMed ID: 20064844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Testing for homogeneity in meta-analysis I. The one-parameter case: standardized mean difference.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Bjørkestøl K
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 20528863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A weighted FDR procedure under discrete and heterogeneous null distributions.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Sarkar SK
    Biom J; 2020 Oct; 62(6):1544-1563. PubMed ID: 32367597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
    Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Adaptive designs: looking for a needle in the haystack-a new challenge in medical research.
    Bauer P
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1565-80. PubMed ID: 17935261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
    Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cluster formation as a measure of interpretability in multiple testing.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):852-60. PubMed ID: 18932143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
    Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A gatekeeping procedure to test a primary and a secondary endpoint in a group sequential design with multiple interim looks.
    Tamhane AC; Gou J; Jennison C; Mehta CR; Curto T
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 28589692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A region-based multiple testing method for hypotheses ordered in space or time.
    Meijer RJ; Krebs TJ; Goeman JJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2015 Feb; 14(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 25525753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A multiple testing method for hypotheses structured in a directed acyclic graph.
    Meijer RJ; Goeman JJ
    Biom J; 2015 Jan; 57(1):123-43. PubMed ID: 25394320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.