These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23845182)

  • 1. Correcting the optimal resampling-based error rate by estimating the error rate of wrapper algorithms.
    Bernau C; Augustin T; Boulesteix AL
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):693-702. PubMed ID: 23845182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculating confidence intervals for prediction error in microarray classification using resampling.
    Jiang W; Varma S; Simon R
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article8. PubMed ID: 18312213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification based upon gene expression data: bias and precision of error rates.
    Wood IA; Visscher PM; Mengersen KL
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 23(11):1363-70. PubMed ID: 17392326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ties problem resulting from counting-based error estimators and its impact on gene selection algorithms.
    Zhou X; Mao KZ
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2507-15. PubMed ID: 16908500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data.
    Saha KK; Paul SR
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models.
    Marques TA
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 15339299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applications of multiple imputation to the analysis of censored regression data.
    Wei GC; Tanner MA
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1297-309. PubMed ID: 1786320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A general, prediction error-based criterion for selecting model complexity for high-dimensional survival models.
    Porzelius C; Schumacher M; Binder H
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):830-8. PubMed ID: 20213716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of misclassified correlated binary data using a multivariate probit model when covariates are subject to measurement error.
    Roy S; Banerjee T
    Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):420-32. PubMed ID: 19588453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating error rates in the classification of paired organs.
    Brenning A; Lausen B
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4515-31. PubMed ID: 18465836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adapting prediction error estimates for biased complexity selection in high-dimensional bootstrap samples.
    Binder H; Schumacher M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article12. PubMed ID: 18384265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correcting the bias of spike field coherence estimators due to a finite number of spikes.
    Grasse DW; Moxon KA
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 104(1):548-58. PubMed ID: 20484529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyzing spatially distributed binary data using independent-block estimating equations.
    Oman SD; Landsman V; Carmel Y; Kadmon R
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):892-900. PubMed ID: 17489971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Between classification-error approximation and weighted least-squares learning.
    Toh KA; Eng HL
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Apr; 30(4):658-69. PubMed ID: 18276971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External cross-validation for unbiased evaluation of protein family detectors: application to allergens.
    Soeria-Atmadja D; Wallman M; Björklund AK; Isaksson A; Hammerling U; Gustafsson MG
    Proteins; 2005 Dec; 61(4):918-25. PubMed ID: 16231294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Entropy-based gene ranking without selection bias for the predictive classification of microarray data.
    Furlanello C; Serafini M; Merler S; Jurman G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 4():54. PubMed ID: 14604446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
    Lu B; Preisser JS; Qaqish BF; Suchindran C; Bangdiwala SI; Wolfson M
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):935-41. PubMed ID: 17825023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.