These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Bioethics: the intersection of private and public decisions. Iltis AS J Med Philos; 2004 Aug; 29(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 15370300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In response to "The development and piloting of a capacity and assessment tool". Sharp HM; Mills K J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 12448193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mental capacity: in search of alternative perspectives. Berghmans R; Dickenson D; Meulen RT Health Care Anal; 2004 Dec; 12(4):251-63; discussion 265-72. PubMed ID: 15658081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Decision-Making Capacity and its Relationship to a Legally Valid Consent: Ethical, Legal and Professional Context. Lamont S; Stewart C; Chiarella M J Law Med; 2016; 24(2):371-86. PubMed ID: 30137710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research. Buller T J Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 41(8):701-7. PubMed ID: 25118248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the gray areas of informed consent. Dunn D Nurs Manage; 2000 Jul; 31(7):20-5; quiz 25-6. PubMed ID: 15127502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Who decides--the patient, the physician or the rabbi? Glick SM Assia Jew Med Ethics; 2004 Sep; 4(2):20-30. PubMed ID: 15573424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The notion of free will and its ethical relevance for decision-making capacity. Zürcher T; Elger B; Trachsel M BMC Med Ethics; 2019 May; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 31068168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A decision for Sam. Gropelli T J Gerontol Nurs; 2005 Jan; 31(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15675784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical waves of the silver tsunami: consent, capacity, and surrogate decision-making. Dunn LB; Alici Y Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2013 Apr; 21(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 23498377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Precommitment issues in bioethics. Robertson JA Tex Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 81(7):1849-76. PubMed ID: 15478266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research? Berger JT J Med Ethics; 2011 Jan; 37(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 20952491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The practice of autonomy and the practice of bioethics. Schneider CE J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 12235687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The therapeutic misconception and our models of competency and informed consent. Lidz CW Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):535-46. PubMed ID: 16883621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On competency, consent and emotional duress: a case study. Ringer T Princet J Bioeth; 2001; 4():98-108. PubMed ID: 12166469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Competence in chronic mental illness: the relevance of practical wisdom. Widdershoven GAM; Ruissen A; van Balkom AJLM; Meynen G J Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 43(6):374-378. PubMed ID: 27165839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]