157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23845317)
1. Psychiatric consultations and ethics consultations.
Leeman C
Psychosomatics; 2013; 54(5):502-3. PubMed ID: 23845317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond capacity: identifying ethical dilemmas underlying capacity evaluation requests.
Kontos N; Freudenreich O; Querques J
Psychosomatics; 2013; 54(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 23218060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the Competence Assessment Tool.
Baergen R
J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 12448192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioethics: the intersection of private and public decisions.
Iltis AS
J Med Philos; 2004 Aug; 29(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 15370300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In response to "The development and piloting of a capacity and assessment tool".
Sharp HM; Mills K
J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 12448193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mental capacity: in search of alternative perspectives.
Berghmans R; Dickenson D; Meulen RT
Health Care Anal; 2004 Dec; 12(4):251-63; discussion 265-72. PubMed ID: 15658081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Decision-Making Capacity and its Relationship to a Legally Valid Consent: Ethical, Legal and Professional Context.
Lamont S; Stewart C; Chiarella M
J Law Med; 2016; 24(2):371-86. PubMed ID: 30137710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research.
Buller T
J Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 41(8):701-7. PubMed ID: 25118248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the gray areas of informed consent.
Dunn D
Nurs Manage; 2000 Jul; 31(7):20-5; quiz 25-6. PubMed ID: 15127502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Who decides--the patient, the physician or the rabbi?
Glick SM
Assia Jew Med Ethics; 2004 Sep; 4(2):20-30. PubMed ID: 15573424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The notion of free will and its ethical relevance for decision-making capacity.
Zürcher T; Elger B; Trachsel M
BMC Med Ethics; 2019 May; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 31068168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A decision for Sam.
Gropelli T
J Gerontol Nurs; 2005 Jan; 31(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15675784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical waves of the silver tsunami: consent, capacity, and surrogate decision-making.
Dunn LB; Alici Y
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2013 Apr; 21(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 23498377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Precommitment issues in bioethics.
Robertson JA
Tex Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 81(7):1849-76. PubMed ID: 15478266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?
Berger JT
J Med Ethics; 2011 Jan; 37(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 20952491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The practice of autonomy and the practice of bioethics.
Schneider CE
J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 12235687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical ethics consultations: reasons for optimism, but problems exist.
Perkins HS
J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11643065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The therapeutic misconception and our models of competency and informed consent.
Lidz CW
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):535-46. PubMed ID: 16883621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On competency, consent and emotional duress: a case study.
Ringer T
Princet J Bioeth; 2001; 4():98-108. PubMed ID: 12166469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Competence in chronic mental illness: the relevance of practical wisdom.
Widdershoven GAM; Ruissen A; van Balkom AJLM; Meynen G
J Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 43(6):374-378. PubMed ID: 27165839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
