70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23845332)
1. Re: prostate cancer risk inflation as a consequence of image-targeted biopsy of the prostate: a computer simulation study.
Taneja SS
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):535. PubMed ID: 23845332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Targeted biopsy boosts detection of high-risk prostate cancer.
Tanday S
Lancet Oncol; 2015 Mar; 16(3):e107. PubMed ID: 25639367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Editorial comment on: MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overview of techniques and a systematic review.
Sciarra A
Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):526-7. PubMed ID: 18571308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Editorial comment on: MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overview of techniques and a systematic review.
Coleman JA
Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):525-6. PubMed ID: 18571310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Editorial comment to Real-time Virtual Sonography for navigation of prostate-targeted biopsy by using magnetic resonance imaging data.
Elwagdy S
Int J Urol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):861. PubMed ID: 20887632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer: initial clinical experience with real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance and magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion.
Fiard G; Hohn N; Descotes JL; Rambeaud JJ; Troccaz J; Long JA
Urology; 2013 Jun; 81(6):1372-8. PubMed ID: 23540865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer simulated additional deep apical biopsy enhances cancer detection in palpably benign prostate gland.
Matsumoto K; Egawa S; Satoh T; Kuruma H; Yanagisawa N; Baba S
Int J Urol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1290-5. PubMed ID: 17010007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy.
D'Amico AV; Tempany CM; Cormack R; Hata N; Jinzaki M; Tuncali K; Weinstein M; Richie JP
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):385-7. PubMed ID: 10893591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology.
Wefer AE; Hricak H; Vigneron DB; Coakley FV; Lu Y; Wefer J; Mueller-Lisse U; Carroll PR; Kurhanewicz J
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):400-4. PubMed ID: 10893595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI-guided and robotic-assisted prostate biopsy.
Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 22617059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer.
Numao N; Yoshida S; Komai Y; Ishii C; Kagawa M; Kijima T; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):502-8. PubMed ID: 23473904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies.
Delongchamps NB; Peyromaure M; Schull A; Beuvon F; Bouazza N; Flam T; Zerbib M; Muradyan N; Legman P; Cornud F
J Urol; 2013 Feb; 189(2):493-9. PubMed ID: 22982424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer simulation of the probability of detecting low volume carcinoma of the prostate with six random systematic core biopsies.
Daneshgari F; Taylor GD; Miller GJ; Crawford ED
Urology; 1995 Apr; 45(4):604-9. PubMed ID: 7716840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advancements in magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.
Macura KJ
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Dec; 19(6):259-60. PubMed ID: 19512847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging-guided prostate biopsy: conventional and emerging techniques.
Yacoub JH; Verma S; Moulton JS; Eggener S; Aytekin O
Radiographics; 2012; 32(3):819-37. PubMed ID: 22582361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating localized prostate cancer and identifying candidates for focal therapy.
Sartor AO; Hricak H; Wheeler TM; Coleman J; Penson DF; Carroll PR; Rubin MA; Scardino PT
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6 Suppl):S12-24. PubMed ID: 19095124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Innovations in prostate biopsy strategies for active surveillance and focal therapy.
Ukimura O; Hung AJ; Gill IS
Curr Opin Urol; 2011 Mar; 21(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 21178631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Possibilities of using magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer].
Kapustin VV
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2011; (3):53-6. PubMed ID: 22288135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: current status in prostate cancer detection, localization, and staging.
Macura KJ
Semin Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 43(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 18774034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate can improve the predictive value of the urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 test in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and a previous negative biopsy.
Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Cattarino S; Busetto GM; De Berardinis E; Ciccariello M; Gentile V; Salciccia S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1661-5. PubMed ID: 22564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
